Published Oct. 8, 2025, 9:02 a.m.
9am Liberty Essentials - Bill Mohr, Karen the Riveter and Ralph the IT Guy will be teaching the perspective on religion in government. This is a continuance of study of the Constitution and lawful self governance. We will be learning together the relevance of current issues and apply the Constitution for guidance. 10am Greg Martini - Mr. Martini began studying and learning the IRS Tax Code and it’s Status and Standing for American(s), which led him during COVID in 2021 to studying the Law in America. By the end of 2023, he found a group led by David Jose and Mr. Martini began studying all of Dave’s law classes, along with other patriots that have published their works over the past decade. He has become an active Constitutional member of several groups that educate and assemble to learn and discuss our social/political structure in the United States. X/Twitter: https://x.com/i/broadcasts/1vAxRQRdNYgJl Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/636616148890812/videos/696433273486675 Rumble: https://rumble.com/v700z4c-bnn-brandenburg-news-network-1082025-liberty-essentials-and-greg-martini-no.html https://rumble.com/v700z0w-bnn-brandenburg-news-network-1082025-liberty-essentials-and-greg-martini-no.html Odysee: https://odysee.com/@BrandenburgNewsNetwork:d/bnn-2025-10-08-liberty-essentials-and-greg-martini-notices:2 BNN Live: https://Live.BrandenburgNewsNetwork.com Guests: Donna Brandenburg, Bill Mohr, Karen the Riveter, Ralph the IT Guy, Greg Martini
Good morning and welcome to Brandenburg News Network. I am Donna Brandenburg and it is the eighth day of October, twenty twenty five and welcome to our show. We're going to start out this morning with Liberty Essentials with Karen, Greg and Bill. And then we're going to stay with these same people and we're going to continue on with notices. So Liberty Essentials first and then then notices and lawful, lawful processes to take accountability, to enforce accountability and take the nation back. So anyhow, morning, guys. How you doing? Good morning. Good morning. What's happening in Bill, Karen, and Greg world? Well, I started the show with a cup of coffee, which is now empty. I'm way ahead of where I need to be. I'm on my second cup too, so we'll be bouncing. Yeah, I'm on my second one. I don't do coffee, so sorry. You haven't lived then. I mean, that's the elixir of life. It is. Yeah. Remember, coffee is the epitome of patriotism in my mind. When our founding fathers overthrew the tea at the Boston Harbor, the coffee brand in America has now started, and that is a continual protest against British rule in this nation. Okay, I'm putting it up. a link up that you put up and I'm going to tell you what, there is more ads on the Washington standard that I've seen in anything in a long time, but here it is. There you go. So are you a terrorist? According to the DOJ, take this question quiz and find out. I'm pretty sure according to them that I don't know that all of us here are probably fit the qualifications, but, but who knows, you know? Yeah. So, uh, The Patriot Act that was ramrodded through without anybody reading it back in, uh, two thousand and one now, so twenty-four years ago, um, almost twenty-five years ago now, uh, it is anything but patriot. It is anti-patriotic. Everybody should know that by now. But these are just short classifications that a friend of mine, Tim Brown, did. He just listed them out. And it's humorous. It really is. You have to laugh at it because if you don't, the sheer volume of information and the attacks on people, it does get overwhelming. So it kind of makes a little bit light of it, but does give you the answer towards the end of what we need to do to start correcting this and who is actually the terrorist in this country. It's not the people. It's definitely not the ones on this list. But it is, in fact, those who are calling them terrorists. Well, I've got like a nine percent yes on the first ten or nine out of ten on the first ten questions. Yep. Yeah, if you answer yes to thirty one to fifty of these, I guarantee the government calls you a terrorist and eventually they will probably start coming after you in one way or another. But we're not giving the spirit of fear, right? This is all this all overcoming stuff. This is just information that the people need to keep on mind and keep keeping the forefront of their memory so that lest we forget who is actually doing the aggression in this country. All right, so far I've only blown one. I assume the jurisdiction of this questionnaire is clearly their commercial democracy, not our republic, right? Correct. Now I've blown two. Oh, Donna. You don't even have to answer. We know you're on the terrorist list. Well, good. At least if, if they know who to fight, I, you know, it's like, it's like I was talking to, I was talking to some attorneys yesterday was an attorney day for me. And I know to everyone's horror. Oh no, she fights pro se. And she's talking to those darn bar attorneys, the terrorist organization themselves. It's like, well, yeah, but let's just say that I, I, kind of put them all on notice and what was going to happen going forward. And one of them knows Jocelyn Benson very well, as well as Dana Nessel. So, you know, as long as you're going to talk to them, you might as well throw it right out there and let them know, you know, you might want to be a little careful because there's no reverse gear in Brandenburg. Yeah, and you said it in your TikTok this morning. Those on the show didn't hear it yet, but you said in your TikTok that we're founded not on a nation of men, but on a nation of laws, right? This entire nation is founded on the principles of judgment and justice, because if we don't hold the fire to the feet of the wicked, then the wicked are going to rule, right? It's up to the people to do so. So there is a justice aspect that must be done. To all the snowflakes out there, just knock it off over this man thing, okay? We're done with it. Just move on. Find something better, feminazis. It's like a nation of men would be a classification of human beings, and it is what it is. Go ahead. So I was going to get in this morning, the topic of forgiveness, right? With liberty, there must come an aspect of forgiveness as well, okay? With everything we see going on today, This is very relevant because we see criminals in Washington, in our state. We see the criminal UN department and even criminals in our own backyard. Ask Don about that. Let's go to Byron Township and find out. Let's go to my township. I'm still fighting a couple issues. This will be next week. I'll be coming up on this again, fighting these issues. There's criminals in every aspect. In the enterprise, that's probably the wrong word, but in the enterprise of liberty, the liberty that we've been granted, how do we deal with this? This is coming from a Christian worldview, a biblical worldview. How are we supposed to deal with this? We've heard it said over and over, and it's been ramrodded down the throats through these so-called church pulpits, that Christians are to forgive, almost unconditionally forgive. So I wanted to touch base on what it is, what it looks like, and how we're called to do it. And this may upset a lot of people. It upset my own pastor of the church that I've been attending. when I called it out. Let me tell you where this started from. We were at a study, this was probably six, seven, eight months back, somewhere in there. And this came up just in conversation, just breezing across the top. And Donna, you know me, I really don't want to breeze across topics when they're important because things get said that are misinterpreted and it needs to stop right then and there. And it needs to be discussed to get the correct information out, get the corrected mindset. And what was said was if somebody came, and this came from this pastor, he said if somebody came and murdered my child, it may take me a while and it would be very hard, but I would have to forgive him because I'm called to forgive him. And then I would have to let the state handle the justice through the law and prosecuting me. I stopped right there. I said, nope, nope, you got that wrong, right? One more recent example, this whole alleged video of Erica Kirk standing up. Evangelical Christians all over the nation are praising her for standing up and forgiving the man that allegedly murdered her husband. I say allegedly for a reason, right? This is just a narrative they're ramrodding down our throats. I don't even believe that. But nonetheless, we have evangelical Christians supposedly standing up and praising this woman for forgiving a man who murdered her husband. Now, I want to touch, and I'm going to try to lay the foundation on this, because if I get too far ahead, it won't make sense. But I want to touch on this, because are we called to forgive but not forget? Herein lies the question. Because when I read the only example of true forgiveness that we have, coming from a biblical worldview, if you have an alternate worldview, this probably won't make sense at all. So take it as a grain of salt and prove me back. But the only example we have of true forgiveness is Christ's forgiveness when he bore all of our sins on the cross. That is the essence of forgiveness. And so we are called to forgive. Now, the question is, if we are forgiven from those sins, when we die and stand in front of the judgment seat someday, as everybody will, are we going to be held at account and judged for those sins which we were forgiven? I say no. That would be held in double jeopardy. God is a just God. And if he forgives, he will not hold that to one's account. We should all be able to agree on that aspect alone. So with that as the example, let's move forward a little bit. Because that means that forgiveness follows repentance. No one can be forgiven by God and saved through faith alone. without first turning and repenting, as Christ had said so many times. Even to the Pharisees, he called them to repentance, right? He calls all men to repentance. And then repentance precedes that faith. So the first example we have in the New Testament... One of such is John the Baptist in Luke three. All right. Luke three, verse eight. He says there's going to be a lot of scripture here. So get your Bibles out if you have it. Follow along. If you don't have your Bible, you ought to get it. If there's too much dust on your Bible and you can actually write the word damnation, then you probably got a bigger problem. We can address all one of us. We can help. So the first example we have is Luke three, eight with John the Baptist. The Pharisees came while John was baptizing all these men, right? All these men had questions, but the Pharisees came and he said, the brood of vipers, right? Who warns you to flee from the wrath to come? In verse eight, he says, bring forth therefore fruits worthy of repentance, right? He's calling them to show that they're repentant. He still didn't baptize them in the water. We have no record of that. So he's calling them to repent first. Now, we're gonna keep moving on here and Matthew, Chapter six, we have the example prayer. As the disciples are asking Christ, how do we pray? Teach us to pray. Towards the end of that, he says in Matthew, and forgive us our debts. By the way, this is all in the King James. That's what I hold to. And I know there's a lot of translational errors in the King James, but it was good enough for our founding fathers. And I do go back to the Greek often to understand the words. But he says in Matthew six, he says, then forgive us our debts as we forgive our debtors. Right. So there's a conditional statement there. He says, forgive us as we forgive. Keep that in mind. For if he forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly father will also forgive you, he says in verse fourteen. Luke's account of that is very similar. He said in chapter eleven, verse four, and forgive us our sins as we also forgive everyone that is indebted to us. It's an interesting word, right? We talk about indentured servants all the time here on this show, right? It's people that owe somebody something. It is a debt that must be paid. No less than a man's sin is a debt that must be paid to God because God's throne in Psalms ninety seven, the very essence of his throne is justice and judgment. Right. Even tells the Pharisees that he says, you guys do all these things. You tithe, you tithe all sorts of manner of mint and rue. Right. But you leave off the weightier matters of the law, that being justice and judgment. Of course, Wednesday mornings I always get a phone call. So do we forgive trespasses all the time is the question that I have to propose. If there is a trespass against us, if somebody offends us, does something to us, causes a debt that must be paid through justice, do we just forgive them but not forget it? I still say no to them. And here's why. We cannot forgive a debt and then hold the person to an account through another means. That being the state. Right? Just like the example of the adulterous woman when... The men brought forth the adulterous woman and tried to trap Christ in saying, we caught this woman in the act of adultery, right? They were having intercourse on the bed. We pulled her off the bed, basically, right? In the act. And Christ ignores them. I have a theory why he ignores them, because they didn't bring the man. The law requires both individuals to be brought, judged, and convicted. But they didn't bring the man. He ignores them, starts writing on the ground. What does he write on the ground? I don't know. Probably the same thing that Prophet Jeremiah spoke about where he's writing their names in the dust of the ground, right? That the wind just blows it away and erases it. But nonetheless, they all start walking away from the oldest to the youngest. Those that understand first had the experience. And when they were all gone, he turns around. What does he say to the woman? Where are your accusers? I have none. Well, neither do I condemn you. Go and sin no more. Right? So that we have an example of forgiveness. It's not the fact that there was no crime committed, but now there's no accuser for the crime anymore. So go and sin no more. That which is done in secret, quit doing. But we're not going to hold you publicly accountable for this specific crime because there's no one to charge you for. Now, I get a lot of people, feel free to interrupt as we go. I've got like four pages in front of me. Well, what I want to say here is there's two things that I wanted to say, because I see two applications of forgiveness. First of all, the fact that when we forgive, it's really for ourselves, not really for them, you know, because there is justice. But when we forgive other people, it stops our heart from ruminating on the offenses that have occurred. So I see it as a forgiveness. You can forgive a debt, but you can also forgive the offense in their heart, realizing that they're sinners. Why would you, why would you expect people to do anything other than to fail on occasion? Okay. So you're, you set your expectations for what we're living in, which is a fallen world with people that make a lot of mistakes. and sometimes they're intentional and do the wrong thing. If you harbor that kind of spite in your heart, it will literally turn into a bitter root, which God talks about not letting a bitter root grow. So there's two applications, in my opinion, of forgiveness. Forgiving because it cleanses ourselves, and it's not good to hold that. But forgiveness of a debt that has to be balanced out with justice. because there are times that you forgive things that have to happen. But there's also a part of justice and pain for a debt that has been acquired through bad behavior. So I see one as a spiritual implication, and the other one is how you apply it to the material world. So a lot of things in the Bible will go both ways. You'll have a spiritual application, but you'll have a real-world application that – you got to keep your house clean of all sin. And one of that things is forgiveness so that you don't go for vengeance or anything else like that. You're not driven by an emotional reaction, but you're driven by the facts or the issue or a correction like a parent would do for their kids. Okay. And then the other thing that you said that really, really impacted me is having an accuser there, which in a real world situation with Satan, who is the accuser of the brethren, think about this. I really believe that we have the right to take authority over that. And if you're being accused of anything, first of all, that comes right out of the mouth of Satan himself, okay, on any way, shape or form. That's just the way it is. and so so when somebody is accusing another person or you're being accused let's just say you're being accused by satan really look at him and say you are accusing me you are accusing me or anyone else here who the heck are you to accuse any of us god loves us he says that we're okay and you are the biggest screw-up in the history of screw-ups satan so why don't you just shut up and sit down and we're going to get to both of those in the name of jesus christ our lord and savior satan you can just shut up and sit down yep James talks about speaking evil of no brother, right? And not harboring a grudge against a brother. It's a little bit different than forgiveness, but it would be like holding something in front of somebody. It says, hey, you remember when you did this? You remember when you wronged me here? Yeah, yeah, yeah, we're not going to do that again. I'm still holding this over you. That should never be done. That's the same reason why, even in our Constitution, we have the right to a swift and speedy trial. In olden times in this country, we never had trials that lasted years, let alone months. There was an accuser. There was a person accused. Trial was held. It was judged by their peers, people that knew them and could attest to who they were, judged on the fact of the matter. And then trial was held and judgment was executed swift and speedily. That is the essence of justice. And that is the one thing we leave off. But yeah, there is a two aspect to this, and we're going to kind of get into both sides of it. Did I get where you were going before you? Because a lot of times we come on, we don't talk before we get on, and all of a sudden Bill and I are like totally synced up, and it's the craziest thing. Yeah, yeah, there is quite a bit of that right now. One of the things that people like to throw around, right, is the verse, judge not lest ye be judged. Bam, that's it. Matthew seven, verse one, and there's nothing else listed in Matthew chapter seven, right? Just one verse. That's right. Well, and it's like, you know, if you don't read the chapter before, the chapter after, and see how this connects to the Old Testament, you might miss the Ramaz teachings. And I can go into that later, but if you don't do that, you won't understand what was really said there, because the references go back to the Old Testament, and there's quite often... the full story of what's actually being said. Because they may say, Mary had a little lamb like that and look at you. And everybody else knows the rest of it because they all had the Bible memorized. And so they don't normally say the whole thing that's called the remez teaching. Yeah, the scripture says that when our obedience is fulfilled, we take vengeance on all disobedience. Right? Which means we cannot tolerate sin's Once our sins are forgiven and we have fulfilled our obedience to God. Now, does that happen instantly? No. Does it happen in an entire lifetime? No. You're still going to struggle with some issues, right? Understand that also John talked about those that are begotten of God cannot sin. Well, take it in context, because then there would be nobody that is born of God, that is born again. Take it in context. Somebody like that cannot live in a manner of constant sin. That is the duty that even Ezekiel was called out to, to warn the righteous. Now, why do you have to warn a righteous man if he's doing what's right? Because he's going to slip and fall occasionally. You warn the righteous man, lest his blood is upon your hands for not warning. That's what was told to Ezekiel. So going back to Matthew seven, which is what you talked about, Donna, when you were talking about Satan being the accuser, right? Think about this in man to man context. When he talks about why beholdest thou the molt that is in thy brother's eye and consider us not the beam that's in thy own eye. Why are you going around trying to correct somebody else when you're dealing with the same issue? You can't see clearly. You don't have the knowledge nor the wisdom to correct the issue in your brother when you're the one committing it as well. This is so crazy because this is what I've been talking about all week is introspection and thinking about are we worthy of the Constitution? Yeah. It only works with a moral country, and we don't have that right now. So that has to start with each and every one of us looking into our own actions and our own hearts. And the correction has to be there or nothing else works. Yep, yep. He ends that clause in verse six saying, "'Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, "'neither cast ye pearls before swine, "'lest they trample them under their feet and return again,' and rend you, right? They come back and attack you. Think about that in the context of forgiveness as well, when you're trying to correct somebody else and trying to forgive them for an offense, right? If you forgive a murderer that is unrepentant, which is what we have in this injustice system that we currently have, you forgive them and you let them back out on the street, what are they going to do? If they're unrepentant, they're going to commit the crime again. Who's guilty of that? The one that let them go. Along with them, you don't excuse that crime. But the ones that are letting them back on the streets are the same ones that are guilty and the same ones that are partakers in their crime. Think about that when... You're absolutely right. Who was it? Was it James that talked about it? You don't even bid them Godspeed lest you be partakers with them. Right? I don't remember who said that. But that's the same context. You don't give forgiveness to the dogs. You don't give forgiveness to swine. They're going to come back and they'll repeat the offense against you over and over and over. Now, You have to keep this in context because this is going to go farther. He says later on in chapter seven of Matthew, he says, Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly the ravenly wolves. Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes with thorns or figs with thistles? So every good tree bring forth good fruit, and a corrupt tree bringeth forth what? Evil fruit. They can't be reversed. You can't have an apple tree bringing pears. You can't have an orange tree producing strawberries. People say strawberries don't go on trees. I'm saying a bush is a tree here. He says, "...whereby by their fruits ye shall know them." In Luke's account, in chapter six of Luke, he goes in and he goes a little bit farther in his recording of what was said. Verse thirty-seven, he says, "...judge not, and ye shall not be judged. Condemn not, ye shall not be condemned." Now, I'm going to break there. Remember what Christ said. Everybody knows John three, sixteen. Right. How many people know seventeen and eighteen? Right. He didn't come into the world to condemn the world. The world was already condemned. They're condemned by their own actions, by their own fruits. Right. There's no reason to condemn a person that's already been that is already condemned. visibly displayed that they're guilty. Right? Guilty. They do that themselves. That's very clear. And then he ends by saying, forgive and ye shall be forgiven. This is the part where I think a lot of people get confused. And it may be out of I don't know. It may be out of a fear saying, well, if I don't forgive this person, God's not going to forgive me. I have no salvation in Jesus, etc., etc. It can be propaganda in the church, too. You know, there's a lot of propaganda in the church where they don't want to they don't really want to address actual issues. And I think that's why we've seen such a rapid decline in the morality of the United States. That's right. And he ends in verse thirty eight by saying, for with the same measure that ye meet with all, it shall be measured to you again, which means the the judgment that you that comes out of you against an individual. It's going to come back to you, whether righteous or evil judgment, it's going to come back to you. So be very careful on how you judge matters. Be very careful on how you forgive, because if you are going to be an accomplice in the next prime of an unrepentant individual, that's going to come back to you again. So let's bring this a little more locally. Most people are familiar with Matthew eighteenth. I don't like to just stick there. There's several other passages that all comply to it. Before Matthew, I'm sorry, in Mark's account of that, He says, Therefore I say unto you, what things soever ye desire when ye pray, believe that ye'll receive them, and ye shall have them. He says, When ye stand praying, forgive if ye have ought against any. Which means if you have a grudge or an offense against somebody else, it is your duty, your obligation to forgive them. If you're harboring any ill towards a brother or sister. He says, Forgive if ye have ought against any, that your Father also, which is in heaven, may forgive you your trespass. But if you do not forgive, neither will your Father, which is in heaven, forgive your trespass. Move on to Matthew, Matthew, Matthew, Matthew, Matthew, Matthew, Matthew, Matthew, When he talks about in verse ten, he says, take heed lest you despise not one of these little ones. Now, before he's talking about the kingdom of heaven being as a little child, right? He's describing that, the mentality of that. I've got a whole lesson on just that topic. That's a beautiful topic. But then he goes into the little ones, right? The young in spirit, the young in the Lord. You don't put a stumbling block in front of them. You don't offend them. Lest a millstone should be hanging around your neck. You should be thrown into the sea, right? That precedes this. But he says, And if so be that he find it, verily I say unto you, he rejoices more of that sheep than of the ninety and nine which went astray. Even so it is not the will of your father which is in heaven that one of these little ones should perish. Understand the heart of the father. It's the very essence. He takes no pleasure in the death of his creation. So shouldn't we? That's why I say these people that call for a civil war, you're lunatics. I take no pleasure in the death. I take pleasure in justice and righteous judgment because that is the heart of my Father in heaven. There's the difference. But he goes on in verse fifteen. He talks about a brother trespassing against you. You go and tell your fault to him. If he hears you, thou hast gained thy brother. Bear that in mind. If he will not hear you, then you take two or three more, right? That you can account for every word, that every word can be established. If he doesn't hear them, right? Now, you're pointing out an offense against you. You're not pointing out a public sin, but an offense against you. But if he doesn't hear them, you take it to the church. If the church, the whole council, the assembly, if he doesn't hear them, you treat them as a heathen and publican, right? Get out of here. You have no part with us. And I'll explain that a little bit farther. He says in verse nineteen, if two of you shall agree on earth as touching anything that they shall ask, it shall be done for them of my father which is in heaven. Now, wait a minute here. This kind of goes into verse twenty, where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them. People like to take that out of context all the time. That verse is regarding judgment between individuals within the ecclesia, within the assembly. The church is the judgment house of offenses that are committed among the body. They are the ones who are called, we'll get to this later on too, to purge out the old leaven. Well, that goes into cleaning out your own house first. It doesn't, you know, if you're a Christian, that's the first thing that needs to be addressed. And all of this hysterical screaming about, you know, the Muslims, the Jews, the Chinese, the this, the that, whatever. I mean, pick an issue, you know, and such. It's like, so everybody's an enemy, but you don't even see the enemies within your own home. Yeah, and that goes into the beam that's in your eye, trying to remove a speck out of your brother's eye while you've got a beam in your own eye. I say it all the time. Everybody here would agree local action creates national impact, right? General Flynn was one of those ones that said it as well. Our first judgment where we should have our sole focus is on our own individual lives, then our own family lives, then our own ecclesia, our own assemblies in our communities, then our own townships, our counties, our states, then our country. Forget this whole policing the world issue. We're not even an ant in that world of policing. Well, to your point, what we're talking about here is the difference between being a help and punitive damages. A lot of people just want to go straight for the punitive damages rather than going in and stepping in to help as the body is supposed to, which kind of like, you know, what's our real goal here? Is our goal here to serve God or is our goal here to be right and get our own agenda pushed forward? That's a big spiritual issue. And the way the government works right now, it's all punitive and revenue raising instead of why aren't we getting ahead of some of these issues and actually having people go out and actually help people that are having issues instead of just coming down to them punitively. So once again, this has got two different trajectories of attack. To to go after the problems, the societal problems that we have. Yep, that's right. Now, I would love to see Joe Biden. Right. Of all the people that actually harbor hatred toward Joe Biden, I don't harbor hatred. Right. He's a wicked man. He does wicked things. I can't expect any more out of him. I don't harbor hatred towards the man. I wish that he would repent. I wish that he would turn to faith. I wish God would call him out of that. That's my hope. Same with Benjamin Netanyahu. Benjamin Malachowski is his name. I hope that he repents, that he turns to faith. I don't wish any of these men dead. But if they continue along their path, eventually it's going to come down and justice will be done, whether by the hands of an individual that God calls out or whether by God himself, and he just takes them out of the world and brings them to the judgments. Either way, either one of those three scenarios, I have no hatred. I have no lot in the matter except to call them out for their crime. And that is not an offense against me individually. That is a public offense against God and the laws that were established in this country on common law and the Torah. Even Peter tells Paul, those that sin, you rebuke before all that all men may fear. Those that are committing public grievances against God, not private, public grievances, you call out publicly. And that's what a lot of people don't want to do. That's what a lot of people don't want to hear. If it's private, go deal with it. Don't come to me with your private matter. You go deal with it. If you can't deal with it after one try, I'm willing to help. But don't come to me first. I'm going to tell you no. Simple as that. Follow the path that's been laid out for us by Christ Himself in Matthew. Luke goes in further. I don't know where that one was. Oh, yeah, Luke goes in further. And he describes it. Remember, Matthew talks about if a brother hears you, then you forgive him, right? Luke records that a little bit different. In chapter seventeen, verse three, he says, take to heed to thyself if thy brother trespass against thee, rebuke him. And if he repent, forgive him, right? If he turn again unto thee, if he seeks to make it right, you forgive him, right? And we'll get into that a little bit farther too. Let's look at an example of forgiveness, right? Because we kind of have the basis on how to forgive, when to forgive. Let's look at what that looks like, right? Later on in Matthew, after Christ talks about this, Peter comes to him, right? I think Peter had red hair. He must be just a fired individual who just jumps to conclusions all the time. And I definitely would not get along with him in life, but nonetheless, Hey, we get along, and I do that all the time, Bill. So, I mean. You have red hair, though. It's a red-headed one, but I really get along. And I'm not knocking redheads, but that just seems to be the way it is. Everybody has their own genetic code. We're wired in certain ways to do certain things. That's the gifts that we've been given. But Peter comes to him and says, Lord, how often shall I forgive my brother? Should I just forgive him seven times as the law requires of him? And Christ says to him, not until seven times, Peter, but seventy times. Four hundred and ninety times a day you've got to forgive this guy if he comes and offends you and then turns again and repents back unto you. Four hundred and ninety times. Now, is that possible? No. I don't know of anybody that could do that, right? Well, I know a couple people that they probably would apply to. Could offend that many times, yes. But actually come back and repent, I highly doubt. The thought process is there is you forgive forever. If the person comes back and repents and seeks to make it right, you just continuously forgive them, right? But it becomes clear, remember, you've got to judge them by their fruit, whether they're repentant or not. Christ goes in and gives them this parable. He says, One was brought unto him which owed him ten thousand talents. A huge sum of money. For as much as he had not to pay, his Lord commanded him to be sold and his wife and his children and all that he had and payment to be made. By the way, this is still in our Constitution. Slavery was never done away with. It is now just the state's way of paying for servitude. And you don't get any, by the way. But nonetheless, this guy couldn't pay. So you're going to sell everything you have and you're going to pay your debt and then you're going to work for whatever does not get paid by your sale, right? That is the thought process here to this game. He said, the servant therefore fell down and worshiped him, saying, Lord, have patience with me, and I will pay thee all. He didn't say, oh, you wicked king, you can't do this to me. This is unjust. I don't have the money to pay. You should just relinquish me of all this. You should give me a federal grant to pay for the student loan that I acquired. It's that kind of mindset. No, you acquired this debt. You are obligated to pay it. This servant understood that. He's like, crap, I am screwed. The bank's called in my loan and I can't pay it. What does he do? He falls down in front of him and basically begs for mercy. Give me some more time. I'll find a way to pay it. The Lord of that servant was moved with compassion. He saw the repentant mindset. He saw that this guy still wanted to make it right. but didn't have the means to right now. He was moved with compassion and loosed him and forgave him the debt. The whole thing. White Queen's like, hey, okay, I see it. Just don't worry about it. You don't owe me anything anymore. Wow. That's forgiveness, right? Same thing that Christ did with us on the cross. He forgave us everything. We have no debt that must be paid except our own selves. We have to die to selves. and then serve the one who forgave us out of love, not out of slavery servitude, but out of a love for the one who forgave us that. Remember, he who is forgiven much loves much. He goes on to say, but the same servant went out and found one of his fellow servants, another guy that worked for him. He said, which owed him a hundred pence. Yeah, a little bit. He owed... He laid hands on him, took him by the throat and said, pay me what you owe me. Now remember, this guy doesn't owe his Lord anything right now. I don't know what other debts this guy acquired, but he doesn't owe his Lord anything. He grabbed his worker, maybe his employee, grabbed him by the throat and he said, you owe me this much, you're going to pay me. His servant did the same thing, fell down at his feet and besought him saying, have patience with me and I will pay thee all. The exact same phrase that came out of the servant's mouth. his fellow servant did to him. And what did he do? It says he would not, he would not forgive the man, but went and cast him into prison until he should pay the whole debt, right? Put him in servitude, put him in slavery, forced him to pay it to him. And look at what's happening in our current system right now, in our prison system, which has absolutely been privatized. It's a for-profit entity at this point in time. And there are so many people that are in jail and prison that shouldn't be there. And so many that have just been let out randomly to create chaos on the world. I mean, you can apply this to modern day situations right now. Yeah, absolutely. Lack of discernment and wisdom. Yeah, and I'm going to give you one of those examples here in a minute. So he took his fellow servant and cast him into prison. His Lord hears about it. What does he do? He calls him back. He says, you wicked servant, I forgave you all of that debt, that huge amount that you owed me, the ten thousand talents, and you couldn't forgive this man a hundred pence? He said the Lord was wroth and delivered him to the tormentors till he should pay all that was due him. It never said that the fellow servant was ever released from the jail, from the prison that he was put in. Right? But the first servant that owed the ten thousand talents, now he was put in torment. He was put into slavery, and that debt was called once again. He ends up by saying, So likewise shall your heavenly Father do unto you, if ye from your hearts forgive not everyone his trespass. The context is you forgive the debt. There's nothing owed anymore. Right? I just told you I was going to give you an example, and that example has left. So that might come back in a minute. A little return. A modern-day example of it is where you were going. Yeah, yeah. There's examples all over, right? When Paul says, I dare not speak about that which God has not wrought in me, I try to keep that in context. If I don't have firsthand experience about it, I really don't want to talk about it because it's just information. I don't really have the wisdom to divulge on what I'm talking about. And that's where the propaganda starts is when we start listening to all this nonsense like this Charlie Kirk thing. And I'm going to keep putting this out there. This whole nonsense is pimping the dead at this point in time. And I'm not okay with this. I've gotten so many notices and begging for money that it's like this is nothing. This has turned into nothing more than pimping the dead. That's if there is any dead. There you go. If there is any dead, the alleged dead, because I don't believe it. There's too many weird things that are not fitting here. And we can go through this whole thing, including knocking the set down within hours after something that should have been designated a crime scene. There's too many questions. You know what I think is cool, though? I think it's cool that a lot of people are in agreement with us, that we don't know what exactly happened that way, but we see that somebody's trying to fool us, and maybe multiple sides are trying to fool us into various narratives about this whole thing. We know we've been fooled. I keep using the term Nigerian prince. The Nigerian prince is the idea of the scammer. That you're being manipulated by somebody. And everybody knows who the Nigerian prince is. It's just a scam. Like he's going to give you some money. Well... There's a bunch of Nigerian princes out there. Some of them are good guys. Some of them are bad guys. They're all trying to sway your mind. And I think a lot of people are seeing this like some did for Kennedy. But I think a lot of people are like, this doesn't smell right. I'm not buying it. And I almost wonder if that's the whole point. Did we reach a point in our country that suddenly we're being tested to see where our discernment level is at as a whole, as a whole body of Americans? Can we figure this out? Can we see through it? Did you know that there's a geofence that they did? I don't know if you guys heard about that. I think it was the memorial service. They call it a memorial service. I call it an entertainment show. It wasn't a memorial. They tracked everybody's phones. Does a church do that to you? There's a real church who's just in it to bring people to Jesus by way of Charlie Kirk. No, they're tracking a bunch of people and trying to get money out of them. What does that tell you? I was at an event last week, and I wasn't the only one at the table that had somebody got up and sat there and ranted and yelled at the entire audience, berating everyone there. None of these people are there trying to help. And the amount of berating that went on there to put people in a state of panic, fear, coercion, manipulation. When they traumatize people at these events in any way, shape or form, you are more likely to be subject to manipulation. It's just the way human beings are. Yeah. And so when you see that somebody getting up there and ranting in the name of Jesus, I mean, that was going on. I was like, I was this close from walking out and I'm like, I'm not listening to this, this doctrine of demons here. that are that, I mean, this one, I, she, it was so bad. She even forgot the prayer and she was supposed to be up there praying, had to come back to the podium to actually pray after the rant. And I'm like, I'm sorry. I'm pretty extra. Sure. This is not the Jesus that was in the Bible, but let's look at this thing real quick. And then we'll jump back to, to a belt chart from general Flynn. Charlie Kirk was assassinated. I'm going to see allegedly I'll add that to the general's post. only a few weeks back, and the American people are still being kept in the dark. There are too many unanswered questions, and the official story doesn't hold water. We're told the twenty-two-year-old acted alone, a lone wolf who somehow managed to compose a flawless text, handle a weapon with expert precision, and carry out the attack without any help or oversight. I've spoken with people who know what they're talking about, snipers, Ballistics experts, weapons specialists, and analysts who reviewed the footage firsthand, every one of them points to the inconsistencies that cannot be ignored. History has shown us, especially in the turbulent sixties, that assassinations are rarely isolated or straightforward. The more profound truths often hide in the shadows. protected by those who benefit from confusion. Until we get complete transparency and real answers from those in power, the questions will not go away and neither will people demanding the truth. And that would be every one of us here because we are sick of the crap. And that is what I was talking about when I mentioned Erica Kirk. Hang on a second, Bill. I'm playing this a second. Can you hear it? Yeah. Issues about taking a weapon apart. I mean, I can get into the technical details because I asked. I went and sat down with experts and I said, teach me about these things. Yeah, I went through all that with experts, with people who are snipers, people who are ballistics experts, people who are weapons experts, people who look at the various footages. Too many questions out there. So what? What does Mike Flynn want? What Mike Flynn wants is our government, and it can be Kash Patel or it can be Pam Bondi, it can be somebody from the White House, but I think Kash is probably the right guy, to stand there and tell the American people, look, we are still investigating this. We have some evidence. We have a lot of evidence, maybe. I mean, it was clear that they dirtied up the crime scene for certain. There's no doubt about that. So just level with us, because the assassinations of the nineteen sixties, particularly the assassination of a sitting president of the United States by elements of our own government, which has now been validated by the latest release of information, and they still haven't released everything, even though Trump said we're going to release everything, they still have not released everything. um but that's why i want cash patel i want somebody from our government to come up and say we're still doing we're still looking we don't know yet we don't know yet i think that's fair i think it takes time i mean it's absolutely fair and it's in fact in fact if i were in government i would say you know in a white house meeting this is what you must do stop all this nonsense about we've caught our guy we there's there's just been too much and what it does what it does is it damages And it continues to eat away and erode the trust between the people of this country and the government. And that's the one thing that must be rebuilt. People want to trust our law enforcement. They want to trust our government. They want to trust Trump. They want to trust Cash Mattel. I do. But this particular issue with Charlie Kirk was such a seminal event in the history of the United States of America. And it smells bad. It looks bad. You know, the old duck thing, right? If it looks like a duck and walks like a duck, then it's a duck. So something about it is not right. So I think this is a brilliant move on his part. He's teaching us a lot in that commentary and on the posts that he put out. Because, number one, I don't think he said a thing about it for a time. Then he tells us, I've been researching. I've been asking people questions. So he didn't go on social media and start blabbing away and getting all emotional about it. He just said to himself, huh, well, well, well, and went around asking for more information about does this match up with what we're being told? And then he came forward and he didn't say, I have this theory or I don't think it happened at all. He's just saying something isn't right and And then, like I said to your township, it doesn't look good for the government. That's what he's saying. It doesn't look good when you're not telling us even I'm working on it. And what he's doing is also basically spurring the American public who are listening to him into the concept of notices. You need to tell them This is your job. You don't look like you're doing it. Give us some information. And that's very simple to do. Now, he's in a position where he has direct contact with some government people. So he can do that through a post or through a video interview. And he knows he's being heard. We don't have that ability as Americans. You know, the average person doesn't have a direct channel to other generals or congresspeople or the president himself. So we have to go throughout some other way of saying, this is your job. Please post to us in some public way that you are doing your job. So there's a lot, I think there and what he's saying and he had, I've been kind of keeping track of what Flynn says and when he says it and how he says it. And that's one of those moments where he's saying you have to rebuild trust. Well, how are we going to do that? Public people out here. I got a question. Do any, do you have trust for any of these people? I've got less. No, none of them. None of them. I, I, I, It just leads me to bite my tongue because I'm going to say this, and it may not go over well here, but whether it's General Flynn, whether it's President Trump, no matter who it is, this is a sideshow with Charlie Kirk. And General Flynn speaking those words, yes, it's nice, but it's not remedy. You said it, Karen. Notice is a remedy. Our constitutions, plural, require us to teach our servants. That's in the constitutions of the United States, all of them across the board. And we haven't done it. And therefore, General Flynn just speaking it has no effect. We've seen it over fifty years. I'm so tired. of hearing General Flynn. If he wants to do something, write a notice and then speak exactly the truth you did and then tell our government servants what they're supposed to do to give us the remedy we want, because we're not going to find out about Charlie Kirk until another fifty years, just like we didn't find out about President Kennedy for another fifty years. So and then it's too late. I am tired of we can't settle For someone just speaking those words and going on and getting interviewed and speaking. Put it in writing. Make it simple. The notices educate that we are in charge, not them. Right now, they believe they're in charge and they can feed us whatever crap they want to feed us, whatever garbage they want to put in front of us. They will continue to feed us. And I think the process of of moving the American people had to stop acting like children who are words of the state. But stepping up, growing up and learning these processes to self-govern if we're going to self-govern if we want the united states to stand we got to step up to the call we have to start questioning learning the processes learning civics and picking this up and and uh and writing it no you we have to look at ourselves and say i'll do it I'll do it. And today I'm going to learn this process and I'm going to do this. I'm not going to expect somebody else to solve my problems. We fix the, we fix that key issue in the United States. And we got this thing handled. We do because what we have to understand in this bill, I'll be right back. Keep going. It was wonderful. The way you started today, because I, It really does go back to forgiveness and repentance. And those two keys are so critical because, I mean, what did Jesus teach us? Love. I mean, that is forgiveness. Forgiveness is love. And it unfortunately, when you take the Bibles out of our schools and then you take and you separate law from equity, law from equity. Attorneys don't judge law anymore. Judges don't judge law anymore. Attorneys don't protect law. They protect equity. Everything is equitable. And they convinced us, all of us, they put us into equity commerce all the time. There is no judgment of law in a court. I mean, they're not judging law. I mean, the reason we had very quick trials historically is because when you had a king or a queen against another king or a queen, I was judged the law and the facts by my peers. Now we've separated them. Now the judge, because all they deal with is commerce, It's equity that they deal with. And the judge gets to decide whatever the heck his law is. And it's not the law in our constitution. It is the law of their democracy because we're all dual citizens in both jurisdictions. So when you walk into a courtroom, every state courtroom, there's not a judge in a state courtroom That is literally going to allow you to stand on your constitutional rights. They can't allow you to do it. Why? Because the only thing that judge can adjudicate is the equity. Equity follows the law. It's a maxim. It's so powerful when you understand that. Yeah. Let's go back because I know Bill's going to have to leave. So let's let you finish up what you're going to do. And then Karen and Greg and I will carry the torch. Go ahead, Bill. Well, that's the reason why I brought up this Erica Kirk issue, right? Because the people have been deceived in so many different ways into believing a narrative. the people praising that moment of alleged forgiveness right and then and then still forgiveness of a debt and then still prosecuting an individual yeah just it solidifies their narrative what did she say i forgive that man as if there's one and it was man right it solidifies their narrative that's the reason why it was put in public view It wasn't the fact that the man needed to be forgiven. It wasn't the fact that that just had to be done because of her alleged Christian faith there. But it was to solidify the narrative that was put in front of people, right? Yeah. Look at a couple of examples here. By the way, that's page three out of five. I'm almost done. Look at the forgiveness of Paul on the road to Damascus. He was in the middle of persecuting and delivering Christians to be killed by the Romans. Bam. Christ shows up, calls him out of it, blinds him, sends him to a disciple, talks to the disciple and says, hey, this man I've called to be a vessel under the Gentiles. Right. And this guy is like, whoa, this is Paul. He's coming to arrest us all and send us. God's like, no, no, no. I've chosen him. Don't worry about it. Well, were the disciples like, oh, okay, yeah, yeah. Hey, Paul, how's it going? You know, here, let's pray for you and let's usher you. No, no, the disciples were still skeptical. Why? Because they understood to judge a man by their fruit, right? Until somebody stood up and until Barnabas stood up on the defense of Paul and basically stated, hey, God has called him out, you know. If that's the case, let's put him to work. Let's see the fruits. Let's see the repentance. Let's see his change. That's the issue. When Paul was dealing with the Corinthian church, everybody should be familiar with this. You've got a man in the Corinthian church that took on his father's wife. Oh, that's no big deal. What happens to people's bedrooms is their own problem. We don't need to be there. Well, wait a minute. No, because the Lord says that that is another abomination in front of him. That is another sin. because it was called specifically that men should not take their father's wives unto them. So you've got a man within the ecclesia that's doing this, and the people were just kind of okay with it. They weren't really dealing with it. It was just, you know, they kind of had that same mindset. You know, well, it's this bedroom. You can kind of do what you want. No, no, no, no. Paul calls them out, and he says, For verily, in chapter five, verse three, for verily, as absent in the body, but present in spirit, have judged already. He's judged the matter already. It's public. Everybody knows it. As though I were present concerning him that hath so done this deed. He says, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, when ye are gathered together. What is that? Go back to Matthew eighteen. You'll find out where two or three are gathered. Right? There He is in the midst of them. When ye are gathered together in My Spirit with the power of our Lord Jesus Christ to deliver such in one unto Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the Spirit might be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus. You don't tolerate it. You deal with it head on. Right? Right? You don't continue to let it go that somebody's going to be destroyed by their own sins. You deal with it. You don't forgive them and say, oh, you know, well, you know, this is just a phase you're going through. You'll get over it. It's not going to bother us. You deal with it. And he explains why that is. He says, your glorying is not good. Know ye not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump? What happens when you put a little bit of yeast in bread? Everybody knows, right? You mix it up. The whole bread puffs up. A little bit is all it takes. He says, purge out the old leaven, which is what we were talking about earlier, that ye may be a new lump as ye are unleavened, for even Christ our Passover sacrificed us. Do not deal with this. I'm sorry, do not tolerate this, but deal with it firsthand. He goes on later on to say that... You don't fellowship with these people. They're blaspheming the name of God out in the open. You don't forgive them and let them continue doing it. You deal with the matter. He said, for what have I to do to judge them also that are without? Do ye not judge them that are within? But them that are without, God judges. You cast them out. You let God deal with them people. Therefore, put away from among yourselves that wicked person. Now, here's the end to that. I was looking for a specific word, but I can't think of it. The antithesis? I don't know. This shows my ignorance in the English language. Anyway, here's the end of that. In second Corinthians, he deals with this issue again, right? They take up Paul's advice. They deal with the man. They cast him out of the assembly. But he goes in second Corinthians chapter two. He says, but in verse five, if any have caused grief, he that he hath not grieved me, but in part that I may overcharge you all sufficient to such a man is this punishment, which was inflicted of many. So that contrary-wise, he ought rather to forgive him and comfort him, lest perhaps such an one should be swallowed up with overmuch sorrow. So there's the ending to this. After you deal with it, when the man has fallen so far, if he remains there, God's going to just give him up to all the vile thoughts of his mind to his own destruction. You don't leave him there. to perish, you go back and you try to deal with it, yet through repentance. You try to get him to understand. You try to get him to turn away from it so that he can be forgiven. You can comfort him and bring him back in. Here's the example I was going to bring up to you. We had an ecclesia one time that was dealing with a man... dealing with a man... Convicted of pedophilia. Not really convicted, but everybody knew, right? And the issue was supposedly dealt with within the church, right? I wasn't a member. I didn't have a voice. I couldn't say anything, right? I was a castaway, an outcast in this group. I would have misfit twice. He was dealt with in the church, right? And he was forgiven, right? but he was allowed to remain in the church. Guess where he was placed in the nursery. I'll check this out. There's no, are you serious? I'm dead serious. Now here's the issue is that the man never, I never saw a change in a man at all. Never, never once. He never made a public statement for his public acts. Um, he never made restitution to any of the families. Um, But, you know, they just forgave him, and then we have to put him back in there. Can you believe this nonsense that the churches are promoting that people actually think is righteous judgment? It sickens me to no end. Right? Here's the example of a forgiving man before Christ himself. Look to Zacchaeus. Zacchaeus was a wee little man. A wee little man was he, right? He climbed up in a sycamore tree for the Lord he wanted to see. As the Savior passed that way, he looked up in the tree and said, Zacchaeus, you come down for I'm going to your house today. There's a song everybody should remember from Sunday school. There's more to it. He said, and he made haste, in Luke, Luke, Luke. Zacchaeus made haste and came down and received him joyfully, that is to Christ. When they saw it, the people around him, they all murmured saying that he was going to be a guest with a man that is a sinner. Christ is going and he's going to eat with this sinner, right? Remember, Paul later on talks about how we ought not do that. But he goes on to say in verse eight, Zacchaeus stood and said unto the Lord, behold, Lord, half my goods I give to the poor. What was Zacchaeus, right? Tax collector. It's commonly known he's a tax collector, right? Tax collectors are the bottom feeders of society, right? And they still are, okay? We all agree with that, right? They're given a task to do, but then they go beyond their task and they steal from the people to put in their own pockets at this time, right? Right. That's a history that at least I've been taught regarding the matter. So like nothing's changed, right? Yeah. So here's everybody like, oh, man, this guy's a tax collector. Christ is going to go eat with him? I mean, this guy's out of his mind, right? But Zacchaeus said, behold, Lord, half of my goods I give to the poor. Here is the sign of repentance and the turning away from one's previous sins and actions. He says, if I have taken anything from any man by false accusation, I will restore him. Fourfold, right? I'm going to pay him restitution plus what the law demands I give him back. Then, the next verse, Jesus said to him, this day is salvation come to this house. He didn't say that before. The signs of repentance was there. Forgiveness was granted. Salvation was given by the God, the God of our Lord Jesus Christ. In that order. Another example, one last one, the unforgiveness of a king. In Luke, another parable that Christ was given, a noble man went into a far country to receive himself a kingdom in return. This was one that he called his servants up. He gave his servants duties. He gave one ten pounds to deal with. He gave another five and another one. Right? Without going into the whole text, everybody should be familiar. The guy that was given ten pounds, he occupied while his king was gone, right? And he acquired an extra ten pounds for the king. He used what he was given to flourish the kingdom that he served. The same with the guy with the five pounds, the servant with the five pounds. But the guy with the one pound, here, here, check this out. The unforgiveness of a king, right? He said when the Lord came back, verse twenty, Here is thy pound, which I have kept laid up in a napkin. For I feared thee, because thou wert an austere man. Thou takest up that which thou layest not down, and reapest what thou didst not sow. And he said unto him, The Lord said unto his servant, Out of thine own mouth will I judge thee, thou wicked man. You knew I was an austere man. Wherefore then gavest not thou thy money into the bank, that at my coming I might have required mine own with usury? Why didn't you do the simplest thing I asked of you? Do the bare minimum that I gave you to do. You wouldn't even do that. You buried it in a napkin because you feared losing it or somebody stealing it from you. He said unto them that stood by, Take from him the pound, give it to him that hath ten pounds. For I say unto you that every one which hath been given from, I'm sorry, for every one that hath shall be given. And from him that hath not, even that that he hath shall be taken away. Now, that's a serious statement, right? He says, but those mine enemies which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither and slay them before me. Now, wait a minute. I thought we were supposed to forgive. How is this that Christ himself is calling out a servant that committed a grave trespass when he had the knowledge of the truth, didn't act upon it, did not repent from it as a previous servant, falling down before his king and worshiping him and asking for just a little more time, a little more space that he can actually finish the restitution that's required to pay the debt. How come this man was not forgiven? I lay it to your candor, this man was not repentant. And why is it we have so many evangelical Christians in America putting up these other alleged Christians in offices to commit the same acts over and over and over because they bear the name Christ and they claim to serve a God when it is really they are children of the devil themselves. That is the issue. No more forgiveness to those who are unrepentant and to those who are continuously seeking harm against the kingdom of God. No more forgiveness. Knock it off. Let's call them to repentance if they don't cast them out, have nothing to do with them. That is the very heart of God in judgment and justice, and that is where we as a people in this country have left it off like the Pharisees have, and we need to bring it back to the table, right to the forefront of everybody's attention. Without that, we are doomed to cause our children to repeat the same mistakes that were laid out in front of us by our fathers. I'm not willing to do it. I'm not. To your point, I think that these people, you know, you go to all of these meetings and listen to people pray. And a lot of times they'll pray, but they won't pray in the name of Jesus. And it's like, I'm not sure who you're following here. But it's like, who do you serve? Is it the Jesus of the Bible? Is it Lord? Who are you talking about is what I want to know sometimes. Because their actions... to harm people around them, say they don't serve the same God I do. That's it. That is it right there. It's wolves in sheep's clothing. It's just like the parasite class of people takes over other people's identities and tries to get the stupid sheep in the flock to say, well, it looks like us, kind of like seems to eat the same food that we are, has the same bah coming out of their mouth. But there's no ability to see this is not the same. And I think that spiritual gift of discernment is something everyone should desire and ask God for is discernment and wisdom. Discernment, knowing what's true and what's not true. And discernment to know how to put that wisdom into how to put that in action. The trees kept voting for the axe because his handle was made of wood. Yeah. Well, look at all of the candidates that are running for governor right now. I mean, come on, guys. The people that are running their reruns from other failed campaigns, and I don't even mean failed campaigns. It's like they keep recycling. They get in office. They come back again, and they come back again. If they could actually do the job, wouldn't the job be solved? They're imposters that are part of a political industry set against us. They are the problem. It may not all be their fault, though, because as Bill was saying, the maxim is frequent recurrence to fundamental principles. And it starts with what he did with reading the Bible. And if we don't go back and go to fundamental principles, the problem is many, many of our servants. Number one, they don't read the Bible. We haven't elected and put people in office that are God-fearing and not man-fearing. They're man-fearing. They are living in this man-fearing because why? Whether you're a Republican, Democrat, Independent, it doesn't matter. If you're going to get into politics right now, You fear that they're going to cancel you or you're not going to get that job or your brother-in-law or sister-in-law or son or daughter, whatever it is. You're not going to get that benefit unless you play man's game. Not protect our rights. And that is frequent recurrence to fundamental principles. It is going back to God's word. We live in a Christian nation with morals and we're given life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness and the right to own property in our constitutions. But we can't affect those. Without going back to fundamental principles so that we learn the civics so that we can do exactly what Bill said. Learn to love and forgive. I guess so. Learn to love and forgive, including our servants. And that's where the notices were. Karen said, very simple. Send them notices so that they know that the law of the land is my rights. Their only job is to protect my rights. That's it. That is their only job. I think that's rolling into this, though, is that just because you hear somebody that's like, I identify as a Republican, a Democrat, a this or that, you've got to watch their track record. And if the track record isn't there, they need to be disqualified. But the track record has to be above us. Yes. The track record has to be they have to look up to God and serve God for our benefit. Right. And if you if there's no track record there and they're just rerunning the same narrative, you've got to break from these narratives, just like this thing with Charlie Kirk. We have to break with these narratives and look at facts, look at what's actually in front of us, not what we want it to be. not living in this Disney World fantasy thing. We want this to feel, we want to feel this way. But if it's not that way, all it is is a way to capture us and harm us. And that discernment needs to be enacted from all of us and critical thinking and listening. And if they don't go back to serving God, and I mean real God, not whatever this nebulous idea of God out there, that seems to be being preached. You've got a problem. You've got Charlie Kirk. We haven't found out what happened in Pennsylvania. We haven't found out what happened in nine eleven. We haven't found out what happened with all of these other rouges that these psyops that that our government literally planned and executed. I mean, that we've got fifty of them that we could go back and find. But we only remember the most recent one because our mindsets have become what Twitter made them. And that is what hundred and whatever they started with, how many words they allowed me to or characters they allowed me to put down. I mean, our mindsets have turned to that because that's what our government wanted them to do. And that's why they give us sports. That's why they give us Netflix. That's why they give us literally two hundred TV stations that we can we can corrupt our minds and never, ever, ever, ever learn the Bible and our constitutions. And all they do is indoctrinate us into that system. which is not love, not forgiveness. I mean, why do we have such a massive divorce rate? It's real simple because our, our, our marriages are contracts. They're not constitutions. They're contracts. We literally have taken from the Republic and answering to God. And we answer to a contract and contracts are easily broken. Easily. They're not constitutions. They're not commitments. They're contracts. The equity follows the law. The law is God's law. It's fundamental common law. And they have converted all of that into equity. And now we have courts of equity. Great. Literally, ninety five percent of our courts in America are courts of equity. And that's awesome. But all that means is you've got a corporation against the corporation and they dissolve the, they decide the equity of the case, not the law of the case. When you have a jury, they only decide, you know, the facts of the case, they don't decide the law. So we can't go into a courtroom and get what bill was talking about before, because we don't have the ability. to go and get a jury of my peers that decide the law and the facts and not not base it on all these case law is a hoax that is a hoax the law is not made by legislators law is made by god in our constitution It is our Bill of Rights. And it's a fundamental common law. It's the maxims of law. That is law. We go into a courtroom and they only decide cases on equity because they're assumed the minute you walk into a courtroom, it is assumed you're already in contract with each other. Whoever the plaintiff is, whoever the defendant is, you're in contract with each other. You're not deciding the transgression case. That occurred. You're not deciding the law against each other. You're deciding the equity. Okay, Bill, you want to finish up here because I know you're going to need to leave. No, I'm good right there. I'm going to leave that right in front of where I left it. And if anybody wants to dispute that matter, I'm more than willing to discuss that one. I think that is a huge issue that needs to be dealt with. It does. Amongst thousands of others. But everyone revolves around that. And Greg, you were talking about how love and forgiveness go together. I would agree with that. However, there's a whole other aspect to it that the mindset of the current church, the mindset of the current evangelicals, is that love requires unconditional forgiveness. However, you have other things, like Paul talking to Timothy, about how you are to rebuke one another with all longsuffering, right? That all Scripture was given for doctrine, rebuke. exhortation and instruction and righteousness. I might have had that a little screwed up, right? But love is also being willing to tell somebody the truth, no matter how detrimental that might sound, but telling them the truth to prevent further destruction, to prevent further decay, right? That is why in the early days of this country, we were as, as, As people of America, we were given all the facts. They were laid out because if we are knowledgeable, we were well enough equipped to deal with any situation. Now they hide the truth because they don't believe that the people can handle it. We have it backwards in America, and it's time we change it. But love requires a response, one way or the other. And sometimes you might not like what I have to say, but I can tell you, I love you enough to tell you the truth, and I'm not going to hold the truth out of hatred. Amen. You know, it's like in a family, if you have a bunch of kids, I mean, think about God having a bunch of his kids down here. When one of your kids harms one of your other kids, you're not just going to say, I forgive you and not have consequences for it. You have to correct the behavior. And I think that to look at it that way, it's a kind thing because you have to protect the one who's being harmed. And the other guy, he's got to get his act together or he's like in timeout like forever, right? And until the until the action and the mindset changes. And that's really the loving way to look at it. It's not that God, you know, doesn't love even the person who's doing the wrong. But he's like, come on, you know, get it right. Stop it. Knock it off. And let's move forward into good future. So, OK, we're going to go to a real quick break and then I'll be back with Greg and Karen and notices. Fifty seven seconds. Exactly. Thanks, Bill. Have a good day. Good morning and welcome to the second hour of Brandenburg News Network. I am Donna Brandenburg and it is the eighth day of October, twenty twenty-five and I'm here with Karen and Greg. Yay. Hello. Party on, Wayne. What's that? We're like, yeah, party on, Wayne. We've got a Karen's that likes to make me and she, she has several of them where we're like on the host to co-host of, of shows. And it's like Wayne's world. She's got one. It's hilarious. We were Laverne and Shirley too. And Johnny Carson and Ed McMahon. We've got all, we've got this whole, a whole bunch of memes out there. They're hilarious. Karen makes great memes. Did you see the rollercoaster one? I did not. I was in one of our chats. Right after last week, we were talking about a rollercoaster ride and, I made one a long time ago. Somebody made one that's got little Pepe on a roller coaster. I love it. And I put little Donald behind Pepe. So I shared that. It's so cute. Here, I'll post that on Telegram. channel. You'll have to, you'll, you guys, you gotta, you gotta laugh at some of this. You know, we talk about very, very serious subjects, but the reality is, is that, that, uh, you know, you can't let it get to you. You know, it's just one of the biggest things is being able to look at this stuff without letting it destroy your joy every day. I mean, God talks about it. is don't let, don't let this kind of stuff destroy your joy. Just keep going. Realize that. Okay. It didn't change anything. Okay. Oh yes. I saw that one. Enjoy the ride. I'm on there with all my little Pepe friends. So Karen's a great meme maker. So, um, Yeah. So, you know, it's just like it's a ride. And quite honestly, I think we learn more from negative things than we do from positive things. Generally, it forces us to change our path, our trajectory. And so to face things that are difficult or that challenge our perceptions, I think it's super healthy because, you know, we don't want to keep just having our biases reinforced no matter who we are. Everybody has biases. It's part of the human condition. And quite often, you know, we go for just wanting to see our biases, have somebody say, oh, you're right, you're right, because it makes us feel good, right? It doesn't make us grow. It's just like, yep, I'm right. Now we're further entrenched into our own psychosis. You know, it's listening to people we disagree with is when we really grow and challenge. And also we learn what we, you know, we learn – better ways of doing things. If we don't just keep going down the same path. I wanted to show you this. I am loaded this morning. So I've got, I've got my stack of books. And so I want to let you guys know, and everybody from your group that you, here donna brandenburg is now that's that's my other books that i have but i'm locked and loaded i thought i'm bringing this guy out this morning that's great and so it's good now i've seen that one i've seen overruled and i've seen the maxims yes i have them all here and i had them when you didn't i love it that's great yeah that was that was a great gotcha that's like john tater coming out and going i don't have any books i'm still on the road It's a challenge coin. Yeah, there you go. You're going to have to bring your library with you when you come up to Michigan. You know what I'm going to do, though? Honestly, it's like when you get up here, I collect books with autographs in them. And so I have this book, the other Gorsuch book. and the maxims of the law that I expect a signature on. I'm going to have Greg, the celebrity Greg, he's going to be signing my books. Oh, that's a great lead in because Karen has been working so hard. I hope that, Karen, are we able to pull up one of those notices that you've been working on? No. No. No? Okay. Let's at least talk about them and remind everybody that what a notice is and why we even do notices. So I think it's important to just keep being repetitive. And Karen has been working really hard, not just with me, but with our group now, to complete some notices so that we can begin to educate. Because the very first part, it goes back to forgiveness, forgiveness of our servants. We are going to assume that our servants are doing us, trampling on our rights because they don't know the law. We're going to assume we know that they're supposed to, and they do, take an oath. to uphold the Constitution of the fifty states and the United States for the more perfect union that we have. But what they don't know is they haven't read our Bill of Rights in each and every state. So I would be willing to bet that most of our servants that are sitting in office that took an oath to uphold our state constitutions, they've not read them. And it's sad because they went to the same schools I did. They didn't learn them in school. Everybody, if they learn anything, they learn the United States Constitution. But they don't learn all of the Bill of Rights in our state constitutions that they take an oath to uphold. You know what we should do, Greg? We should do a challenge. Okay, so like I'm in action, right? I think we need to do a fifty-one day challenge to challenge everyone to read one constitution a day for fifty days. And by the way, And we don't need them to read the entire constitutions to start. Just have them read the preamble. of their constitution and then read the most important that refers to their bill of rights. If you just give them a challenge, fifty one days. I am doing this. I am going to put challenges out there and we're going to do this. So just so everybody knows, I am the chairman of the Constitution Party in Michigan, which is labeled as the U.S. taxpayers party, which I'm trying to get the criminal Jocelyn Benson to change our name who is acting as an obstructionist. Okay. And so that is also, I've also got a lawsuit on her for, for creating an illegal app and registering voters illegally. And that's going, that's going on right now. I haven't rejected it yet. So that's kind of amazing. But at any rate, I'm trying to get the name changed and the state of Michigan is acting as an obstructionist though. Eight other states have done it through a, through just a filing of a name change. And it should be done that way. So we are redoing all of our software for the Constitution Party right now. because what I have to work with right now is so time-consuming, clunky, and ineffective that we have been reprogramming and writing a program off of what I use for my property management, our real estate company, and being able to utilize that that way to organize groups and teams and communications and such. If people don't understand how busy I am, they would be so shocked at how many projects I have going on and how many efforts I'm involved in. One of them is this software project to try to smooth out and actually have a state party that functions for the people. It's going quite well right now, really. And I think that's one of the things that I'm going to add. And I'm sure that I've got somebody watching that is involved in the programming architecture right now. So just so we know, I think that's another thing that we want to do is do challenges. And so here's your challenge and then put it up there so that they can see it and then maybe start a discussion. on what we're seeing so that we can roll people in to an educational, I don't know, outreach. So do you want me to do the first link or the second one, Greg? The second one. Do the second one. All right. Ballotpedia had an issue with them. I just got to tell you that probably if I had run for governor with the knowledge that I have right now, I would be suing them because they randomly took me off Ballotpedia for weeks at a time, consistently over and over and over again. So even looking at Ballotpedia, they're crap like every other one out there because they violated my rights by taking us off Ballotpedia. with no warning, no explanation, just for everyone's... Let's see. There we go. Go over here. Just for everyone's... The only reason I went to Ballotpedia is just because they do have all fifty state constitutions on there. So I've got a grudge match against them right now because they violated my right and screwed with my campaign. But anyhow, I digress. Information is information. So, OK, so here's the Michigan Constitution is the state constitution of Michigan. All right. Hey, this is kind of cool. Got a little synopsis here. Yep. Very cool. And and this is what people can start with just so that they can learn what their rights consist of in their current state. So whatever state they're in, start with your own state. And it's powerful when you start learning your constitutions and your rights and then you question. Well, realize that the Michigan Constitution, we've got a discussion. We have a discussion coming up on that in the next couple of years. That's a great link. And to have to assess the Constitution in Michigan, but realize the one tenth of one percent. It's crazy. And so that is not a legal, it's not legal, but we're working. It's a de facto. At least we start with something, something other than the federal constitution. We have to start with something. I always go back because I believe in going back to the original constitution, because when you understand what our constitutional rights are, they have been extracted from the compact. So the Constitution is nothing more than a political body of people. And we the people got together and we wrote a Constitution. We put that in writing and we all agreed to it. But we withheld all of our constitutional rights from that Constitution. So they can never, ever, ever write a law or a statute or a code against any of my rights. So there's no such thing as the night in nineteen sixty three Michigan Constitution, for instance, they changed your constitutional right to free speech to a constitutional right of civil and political rights. And that civil rights means restricted speech. And that's unlawful. I have an unlimited right for my entire life. to free speech. And forget these words, civil and political rights. Many states have done this, not just Michigan. Many states have done this. Well, Michigan is a communist state right now. Well, are we one in a communist country? What's that? Are we not in a communist country right now? We are, and we are in a communist country, and Michigan is a communist state. I don't want to complain about what we're in. I didn't help us get to this position. Many, many other people did, and they did it a hundred and fifty years ago. So let's not worry about that. the past, let's correct the future for our kids and our posterity. I just don't want anybody to be in a state of denial right now and just say, hey, we're going to just go out and go have our fat-free cookie and our herbal tea today and forget about it. How many people really know that they have been made dual citizens? I mean, most people would not believe that they are a dual citizen of two separate sovereign entities. Their states, which they're born into and the federal government, which made you in the fourteenth amendment, a U S citizen of a democracy, not a Republic. That is a pure democracy. That is all in commerce. So we're, we're literally citizens of both. And we actually, because we live in America and we live in a free country, supposedly the democracy is not free. But we do live in a free country. We have the constitutional right to choose which one you want to live in. And I choose to live in the free one. I choose to live in the republic. But most people don't even know what the republic is. They only know what the democracy is because that's all our government ever speaks about. That's all our politicians ever speak about. So we have to see that and understand. I don't want to be in the democracy. In fact, they take an oath to uphold the republic, which is in their democracy constitution. It says that we are guaranteed a republican form of government. That means a republican form of law. Law. And we are a land of laws. you know what no attorney will ever walk into a courtroom and defend my constitutional rights they won't do it they will not represent me and they will not walk into that courtroom and they will not fight first on jurisdiction and i am guaranteed in my law in the fundamental common law due process of law. So I am guaranteed that based upon the text, history, and tradition when the Constitution was signed. And right now when I walk into a courtroom, any courtroom in the states, it is automatically assumed that I am in a democracy and I don't have those rights and it's a court of equity. That's what they call it. So that court of equity is deciding the equity of the case by contract. So I want to walk into a courtroom where I can get justice in due process of law so that when I own a piece of property and they steal the water off of my property, I don't want to go into a court of equity. I want to go into a court of law. That's my court. I mean, we are the court, not, not the judge, not the jury. We are the court. It's our court. But right now we have an entire system that they put in place where in order to get that remedy, we have to go back. and study the fundamentals and understand why we can't get that remedy and go against our government that is doing these public and private partnerships in order to steal your water. And the only way to do that is slowly in the beginning and educate our servants that, wait a minute, you took an oath. So Karen now has, I believe, three notices that she's about ready to complete. where those notices will go to all of those commissioners, councilmen, whatever they are, and you can send them literally to anybody in the state because they're very direct and they basically inform them that we're the boss. We're the boss and they're our trustees. They are our servants. And by the way, this is- Karen, you want to elaborate on that? Well, I do. I'd rather Karen do it because she's actually worked on these notices, but the notices are. I want to hear what you got to say on this. Yeah. Karen, I'd like to hear what you have to say on this. Well, can you hear me? But as he was saying, the first thing that you have to do is, because we are peaceful and lawful, you can't just jump down their throat. I mean, we can do the jumping down the throat in the public meetings, but we also can do it peacefully and lawfully. We do. And we do that in the public meetings too. You know, I kind of don't mind when people get a little fiery because I think that's appropriate at times. But it's also quite appropriate to show them that, you know, if you're going to wear the label of Christian, you can act like that because they're people just like we are. They're children of God just like we are. And they have not been educated, just like we have not been educated. So if we're educating ourselves in the standard, which someone mentioned this morning, the standard is the Bible, number one, and number two, the constitutions. And we're not talking about how they've been corrupted, and that's the corruptible standard is our standard, because it isn't. So we're going to tell them what they're the true standard is and ask them, do you agree with that? Do you recognize this? Did you take an oath to this? Did you understand what your job is supposed to be? And then it's fair to then say, now that you recognize that, you haven't disputed that, you haven't rebutted that, you're not doing your job right, are you? And again, you take the standards to them, and it may be that you, at some point, you start adding, besides the Constitution, things like court cases, Supreme Court cases. Just like I did to the Byron Township board when I said, here's a Supreme Court case, New York Times v. Sullivan. This matter has already been decided on. And so when they were looking to the sheriff's deputy behind me to maybe come and take me away, I said, no, I'm going to hold them to the oath too. Same thing applies. This matter has already been answered. If you continue on this path, I could sue you and I will win if that happens. Because it's already been decided by this Supreme Court case. Wouldn't you like to write down the name of this case? And not a single one of them did. And I know Donna mentioned it to them before. But that's the kind of thing that you can put in a notice. Look, the Supreme Court has acknowledged this fact. This is now a fact of law. It's part of those three branches. They've already said this is what the law means. This is the interpretation of a former case, which may have something to do with what's going on right now. You can also include the maxim of law. To help inform them of a matter one way or another. And here are our rights. Here's what the Constitution has to say about this matter. Here's a maximum of law and what that maximum of law means. Now, here's what I'm saying that you're doing wrong. Here's what I'm saying I want you to do about it. What say you? And then you give them some time to answer. You give them some time to mull it over. And I think Greg can answer this. There may be cases. And I think I heard that in Byron County, they're having some effect where they are answering notices. They are. Say that again. And they're answering them. And where is that? Where is that, Greg? It's in the Upper Peninsula. I don't know Michigan all that well, but I know the people that are in those cases because we've done lots of notices for them. And in those notices, there's not a single notice that we issue to our servants that's not based in the law. So really, we've never, ever had a notice that they can rebut. Because when you only print the law and not your feelings, you remove your feelings. You remove your feelings completely. And you only print what's in the law. And first in time is first in line. Could that be Shiawassee County? There's Byron, Michigan. I want to make sure I give credit where credit's due here in which township it is or county. And I couldn't tell you what. Okay, guys, answer it. Somebody out there and we the people. Somebody out there, give us a chip shot here on which county it is because I don't think we have a Byron County. So I just want to make sure that we give everybody. And I think it might be something different, but that's okay. I want to be accurate here. It's not Shiawassee. Shiawassee is over by Detroit, but that's okay. Well, I know my group's on here, so they should be able to put it in the comments. Okay, group, step up to the call here. Give us some clarification. While we're getting that for us, these notices and what we're doing is literally educating each and every servant that we have, whether it's a sheriff, whether it's a commissioner. It doesn't matter. It's Delta. Delta. Delta County. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Sorry. That's my bad. Let's see. Mims Five said, watched it firsthand in Delta County, Michigan recently. Notices have been served. So good job, guys. Well, and we've been they've been doing it for years up there. This isn't something new. So and again, they when you when you do these notices. They are evidence for your court of record, which is your affidavit. Notices are followed by affidavit if your servants continue to ignore the law. So an affidavit is your court of record. It is firsthand knowledge of the people that are involved, and you are clearly involved in your water wars. So once you educate your servants that are in your county, And they get these notices, which are real simple to start. We're going to take it slow with them. Now, they don't get a lot of time to answer. I mean, typically, we'll give them five to seven days to answer us. And we know that once we send it to them, they really cannot answer it because there is no answer. It is the law. We're pulling it directly from the Constitution. And if we pull in a maxim, those are settled maxims of law. They are adopted into every one of our constitutions. That is the law of the land. It's just we haven't used them. And then we go a step further and we show them, you know, in SEC versus Jakarsi, which is a recent Supreme Court decision, the Supreme Court said the law of the land is the fundamental, our constitutions and the fundamental common law. That was adopted at the time of our founding. So our founding fathers made that the law of the land, extracted our rights from the law, and now our servants are not obeying it. There you go. Go Delta County. Good job. They've done a phenomenal job, and it's going to continue. And as Bill said earlier, it starts one county at a time, and we go from the bottom up. We are supposed to be managed by us first. We are self-managed in this country. A republic is we are the kings and queens, and they are there to protect our constitutional rights. And what they've done, which is fine that they've done this, they created this corporate structure which, again, They issued charters to corporations and they do these public private partnerships, which again are unconstitutional. There's nowhere in the constitution that allows a public private partnership. We don't allow- It's China. I mean, this is what China's done for years. They've nationalized all business and they've snuck up on us through these wonderful words. It's just like when you look at dominion and dominion did that public accuracy test, which wasn't public or accurate last week, the, the, the entity that's running the elections in Michigan really goes to election source. Election source is a, there's a legal separation, but it's just like, it's a department of dominion. Well, see, and here's the problem, Donna, it, we, we, Number one, I don't like the comparison to China only because we're a republic. We have been given a republic. But it functions. The thing of it is that we may be... Why does it function as a democracy? Hold on a second. Let me say my case here. Just because it's like we are a republic, but this whole thing is the exact same system that's in play in China. with the nationalization of our industry. And it only exists because we've allowed this to exist. We've got to tear this whole thing down because, you know, we were talking, we live in a communist state and a communist country at this point in time, the way that it works. However, If we go back to the basics and kick these usurpers out and kick out all of their unlawful behaviors, I mean, they're the terrorists. They've taken this nation over and go back to functioning as a republic the way it should be. then I think we're on the right track. But just so everybody wants to know, the narrative is China, the big bad China is after us. Guess what? That same system of the corporatocracy is right here. And we need not tolerate this. We're going to have to write this and go back to what this nation was founded on or what you know, or we're lost. And I think we've got one shot at this too. So everybody's got to get in the game, get educated and start moving forward to take this back. Just like an army only we're going to use the army of the pen, our voices and holding them accountable. Not the crazy stuff, not grab your torches and pitchforks. You know, that's, that's a, that's a dummy's guide to destruction of everything we love. I yield. And no, it's again that the comparison to China I have trouble with only because we have been given a gift by our founding fathers in seventeen eighty nine. And that gift is our republic. And we unfortunately yielded control and management and gave up our rights by contract. We gave up our rights to this country. democracy that they created and all we have to do because the republic never left us it's still sitting there and we're allowed to live in our republic and it's we what we have to do is go back and read it learn our bill of rights learn how powerful they are and stand on it and educate our servants that are in many respects elected through the democracy i mean they use those laws and statutes and codes to run an election that is not constitutional in the Republic. It is only constitutional in the democracy. But yet they take an oath to serve two masters. They literally take an oath to serve the master of the republic, but they're never held to those standards. And why aren't they held to those standards? Because the only way to be held to those standards is we, the people, stop believing that our only remedy is waiting until the next election to get them out of office if they don't obey. That's right. The beautiful thing is watching people when it dawns on them that they don't have to sit there and be quiet and be threatened and coerced and all of this sort of thing. And they all of a sudden wake up and go, wait a minute, I can say something. And transformation, it's amazing. Even at a meeting, though, when you see somebody that wakes up to the fact that they don't have to be afraid anymore, that they can stand up, that they need to have their opinions. and the things that they see and call it out for what it is. That's a great, it's a huge step because so many people are afraid. They're afraid to say something. They're afraid of retribution. They're afraid of the kickback or that they're going to get in trouble. You're not, if you get in trouble, get ready to fight harder because that just means that you proved your point, that your point was valid. Yep. We've got a lot of people that are in this fight and I'm proof. They can't just put us in prison. They can't just take our rights away. Once you learn your rights and you learn the law, It's a heavy burden, but it also is it's enlightening. You've gone from darkness to light and you believe and you know that there is real remedy. You just have to learn how to get it. And the way we get it is redress of grievance. And we've got redress agreements that we can go against our government. and mal administration is being performed in almost every public position today and it's because they don't know we have a constitutional responsibility as we the people right to know it and educate our servants because again they learned in the same place we did and they have never been taught That most people still don't know there's fifty one constitutions and most people probably can't even tell you the three branches of government when there's really four. Public service announcement. Silver just hit fifty. It's unbelievable. This is one of the benefits to New York Times for the first time ever. This is one of the benefits to the New York Times versus Sullivan case. They cover those four points that I attempted to make for the Byron Township Board. That the people have a responsibility to instruct their public functionaries. Public functionaries, in turn, have a duty to listen and act based on those things. That doesn't mean that Joe Schmo has what he thinks is a great idea, has to have his idea acted upon because he's one of the people. What it does is it puts it in front of not only the board, but the entire body. Joe Schmo has an idea. What does everybody think of this idea? The board then will make a decision because they are representatives of the people as a whole. And the rest of the people... Answer, no. Joe Schmoe's idea is stupid. He wants another ordinance. Ordinances don't affect people. Then the people can answer as such and they don't have to act on Joe Schmoe's idea. But when Joe Schmoe says, hey, you're trying to enact a new ordinance or you're trying to edit an ordinance that affects the people and you don't have a right to do that. Those are the types of things that the board needs to listen to. And there are some really great lines in the New York Times versus Sullivan case that lay that out really, really well. And also describing the right of the people with free speech before the board in that kind of circumstance to say what they have to say, even if it takes longer than their desired amount of time. And I put it that way because they don't have the right to lay out a rule or policy that for the people to limit their speech. No, if Joe Schmo says, I got a stupid idea and I'm going to waste your next ten minutes on it, then the rest of the people need to step up and say, Joe, hey, sit down, shut up. But if Joe Schmo says, listen here, you're trying to enact an ordinance that unlawfully affects the rights of the people, And he has to take more than three minutes to educate them on that in a peaceful manner. Then they better take that three minutes plus, whatever it's going to take for him to do that. And the people will back him. And the sheriff in the back of the room will back him if he or she knows their job. So the difference in the notices is you're laying it out on paper and it goes on the record whether the secretary or the clerk puts it in the minutes or not. How they answer that. It is. It's your court of record evidence that you're building against them. Maybe not. Maybe not. And that's the point, Greg, too. Let's not forget. There may be some locations, some public functionaries that the first notice you give them, they go, oh, I don't have a problem with answering that. There is no evidence because once you educate them and they see the wrong and they make a remedy for it, there is no court. There's no reason. Wait a minute. Let's take a step back now because in the notice itself that you're sending them, When you say they'll answer it, there's nothing in there that they can deny. Everything that you put in that notice is the law. No, I'm saying they agree. All they can do is acknowledge it. They can acknowledge that you are correct. And then when it comes to giving them a notice where it says you're doing something wrong, not that you're informing them, that you're informing them of a wrong. But they make a remedy in the answering. If they make a remedy to right the wrong that they were doing because they realized that they did not have the authority to do that, I don't have a problem. I'm not going to take them to court. Think about what they're doing. When they make, when legislatures make laws, who are they making those laws for? The government. What do they think or what do they actually do? I'm asking you, what is truth? What is the law? What should they be doing? They're trying to affect the people because they think they have the authority to do that. Because they don't know the constitutional rights are excluded from their constitution. And they can make no law. No law. Not some, not a few, not... here and there, they can make no law that's going to affect my constitutional rights and my right to own my property. As long as I own my property, they can't write an ordinance against my property that says I can't do something as long as I'm not infringing on my neighbors. As long as I'm not harming another, and I call us kings and queens, then they have no constitutional right to write an ordinance that ordinance is for corporations that they charter so that those corporations don't affect my rights that's what ordinances are for it's to manage the corporate structure so that those corporations can't build a business next to me that's going to affect my constitutional rights To happiness. I mean, and that is what that ordinance is for. Water Wars argument, all the pieces right there, because they have literally destroyed so much land. for their corporate taking that they have done. And they've done that in a fashion when we slow down and we think about, we always have to frame the argument. And when we frame the argument properly, and then we educate our trustees, they'll realize their errors real fast. And they also probably don't want what they think they want. I mean, of course they like giving their friends contracts and making money and all of that. But when they realize that they're committing maladministration, which is punishable by treason, I mean, they will begin to think twice about signing that contract and taking that money from the federal government and doing those public-private partnerships that, again, are unconstitutional. But yet they don't get it. They don't understand. So when we slow down, we start with notices. We educate them. That is all building your evidence. If they don't stop doing what they're doing, you know where you're going with that. this this case they do not you're laying the groundwork with these first three simple notices so that they know that you're the boss once they accept the fact that you're the boss then you're going to hit them with something a little tougher explain to me who funded these water wars who is funding those companies where's the money coming from well i'm going to tell you where it's coming from It's coming from Title XLII and the federal government because it's coming from the top down because they want total control of the land. Well, they believe they're dealing with all corporations. They believe each and every one of us is a corporation. Well, we are because they made us one at birth, but we've got the right to stand on our living men and living women rights. We just have to know the difference between those two. And the beauty is we've always got the right to go in and out of the public versus the private anytime we choose. Not their choice, our choice. And when we bought our farms up there, or you bought your farm and you bought your land, I mean, you've got the right to that land. And you've got your constitutional rights, but we've never stood on them. We've never stood on them because when you go to the courthouse and you register your land, They make you register it as a corporation. But that's only because we didn't know any better. So therefore, they think they can infringe on your corporate rights because they now took you and put you into that trust. And that, again, is step three and four. The first step is let's just educate them that we are the sovereigns in America. In America, we the people are sovereign. And that's what the two books that you brought up earlier, Republic If You Can Keep It and Overruled. Judge Gorsuch has said it repeatedly. In fact, Clarence Thomas said last week, we got orangutans driving the train. And who is he referring to? He's referring to every judge in America. we've accepted this case law as law it's not law only legislatures make law and they make it for corporate corporations not for we the people so we got to get that mindset i had to unlearn fifty eight years in order to get to the point where it made sense to me and i had to no one believe me no attorney no cpa No one's going to educate us. We have to educate ourselves. Why? Because they took it out of the schools, so we don't have teachers that are educating us, and we only have small pockets of people around the country that really even know what our structure is. They don't know what the law is. They don't realize that when they walk into a superior court in a state, they're walking into a court of equity. That's not a court of record. That is not following the Constitutional Republic. What a shame that is. I want to go back to the idea of a notice which is answered properly. I have seen, for example, a school board where most of the school board is kind of frowning on the public commentary people, which range from students to parents to people like me who don't have any kids in the area. But I was paying attention to what they were doing, and they were not doing very well. But there was one who would speak up, trying to say the right thing. They had a student or more in the school system as well. One, at least, trying to stand up and do the right thing and voting against things. There's always the possibility that one or more of the people being noticed is going to say, you're right and I could try harder. And if that one is doing their part, I've got no problem with them. No, we were talking about forgiveness earlier. I would then, I mean, if we're going to say I'm coming peacefully and lawfully and with the love of Jesus Christ, then you better act like it when they answer you appropriately. Yes, I do recognize what you're trying to tell me. I've read it. Yes, I recognize what you're trying to tell me. I've read it. Oh, boy. I didn't vote against that thing that I should have voted against. Let me see what I can do about that. Thank you for bringing it to my attention. Public notice on the door of the building or they put it out on the Internet or they in some way answer in a public manner. I screwed up. Maybe they say it in a board meeting in front of the whole public body and they insist that the clerk puts it in the minute record. I wish I had voted differently. I'm going to make a new proposal that we do this thing to rate the error of the other thing. And it doesn't matter for their case as a single public functionary, trying not to use the word individual, if the rest of the board follows suit. If the rest of them are like, yeah, we got those notices. We don't care what that... Karen has to say or what that Donna has to say or what that Greg has to say. No, we're just going to keep on doing what we're doing because we're making some money off of it. And they're never going to get, you know, our attorney says they're never going to get anywhere with this thing that they're doing. This is ridiculous. That's their problem. But for the one, I don't have a problem with that one anymore. Am I correct? You are correct. Clearly, we want them to acquiesce to the oath that they have taken. And whether they have taken that oath and they've actually signed it or not, the fact is they're getting paid by public money. And the minute they take that payment, they have taken the oath to the Constitution. And that is the Constitution of the Republic, not the democracy. So once they do that, And they acknowledge, oh, maybe you're right. I am trampling on your constitutional rights by passing whatever ordinance they passed. That's a public private partnership where they're taking money from the federal government. You know, that is not the way our government was ever supposed to work. We were supposed to be bottom up. And we are now top down because now all the money is printed and originated at the top. And then it strolls down. And that's how they buy their control of every state and county. And that is what they've done to us. We have to understand that. But we have to also understand that that is not constitutional. It might be legal in their democracy, in their corporate structure. It's legal what they're doing. But it's not constitutional. So unless we the people rise up and we say, wait a minute, this is not right. I mean, you shouldn't be destroying my land and stealing the water from my land just so you can devalue it so you can buy it from me and put whatever you want to put here. You can't be putting up these windmills that are literally killing the earthworms within a mile of the windmill and destroying my land because you never told me that. And it's all funded from the federal government down. because they wanted to have the Green New Deal. Well, the Green New Deal is nothing but another way for them to fund NGOs. It is constitutional. And we have to frame those arguments in such a fashion where we can understand it. Donna mentioned earlier, prisons. Why are prisons, all these prisons in America, and I hate to admit, I mean, I worked in the junk bond business, so we funded a lot of these prisons. I didn't understand it at the time. I now understand those are public private partnerships. Those are unconstitutional. Prisons shouldn't be privately owned and funded. Why? Because they need prisoners. And how do they get prisoners? Through the commerce. And how do you get, I mean, us sent to prison? You have the state be the victim, which the state can't be the victim and protect my rights at the same time. How in the world does a state charge someone with a crime with no victims? Look at what they do to make money off of the people in prison too. I mean, you can, I was talking to somebody that was in there and say like a package of ramen noodles, if they go to the store or something like that, it'll be like three to four times what we pay for the same thing in the store. So now they're also extorting money and making money off of somebody who's already in there to pay to pay a debt. And I mean, the whole thing, if you really get into that and they're approved suppliers and all this nonsense, it's all a money game all the way from the top to the bottom. There's no justice. People like you said, there's no if there's no victim, there's no crime. And it's just because they've got to have basically butts in the seats just in order to fix, you know, fill the quota. Yeah. And my, my bad. I get distracted at times and I go down these rabbit holes. I didn't mean to go so far away from Karen's question. Um, I don't think I fully answered it, and I want to make sure I do because I think it's important to understand how these notices work. And when you give a notice to your servants, and if you begin to move the needle in your county by those notices, Yes, that is massive progress. And the fact that they acknowledge those notices, most of the time they will take the notice and they'll give it to their attorneys and they'll ask the attorneys, is this, is this right? Because they don't know because they've never read their constitutions. So, and what happens is the attorneys will say, oh, we don't follow the common law anymore. Well, that's right. They don't. Why? Attorneys are in commerce. attorneys can only operate in commerce so since attorneys operate in commerce and they're chartered in commerce they can only operate in courts of equity well courts of equity is not what the constitution is that's a court of law that's a court of record so therefore The problem is, and that's why our notices say in them, a response by an attorney is a non-response. You know why? Because we understand in our group that we operate in the Republic. And in the Republic, attorneys can't deal in that law. They're not there to protect the constitutional rights of we the people. Inconceivable. It's inconceivable. So to answer you fully, it is educating our servants so that they repent and say, oh, my goodness, I have got to stop listening to this attorney. I am the elected official. You know, attorneys think they have no responsibility to this thing. Well, they've got a lot. They have more than they think they do, and they'll find that out in due course in God's time. Yeah, I think the whole bar association needs to be abolished. Well, it does, but we don't care about that right now. We care that our elected servants. I care about it. I mean, I care, I care about it. It's like, if you get rid of the bar association and, and, uh, I mean, and this, and this entire nonsense, it would be a huge improvement. It's just going to take a little time, you know, That, that portion is going to take time. And rather than just focus and complain on, on the attorneys, because I feel the same way, Donna, with one exception, there is a place. for attorneys and maybe even the American Bar Association in commerce. The problem is I, as one of we the people in sui juris, don't live in commerce, twenty four seven. Now, my government has made me live in commerce twenty four seven. And therefore attorneys are all relevant to all of us because we can't get sued and walk into a court and hire an attorney who can only deal in commerce. They cannot walk in that courtroom and defend me on my constitutional rights. They can't dismiss that case in court. I'm going to stand on the fact that the bar needs to be abolished because it is a department in essence of a country club under the Supreme court of Michigan. And so we've got we got a real problem there because they never had a right to to form this or give it as much power as it has, as well as there's no such thing as a license to practice law. Now, I met with some attorneys last night and they asked me, they said, are you an are you an attorney? I said, not a bar attorney. And I've got a lot of friends that are not a bar attorney either. And they said, well, you have a license to practice law. I said, neither do you. So what do we hear the mic drop in the room? I mean, what do we have a right to do in our constitution? That's, that's more important than being an attorney. I mean, I, I know the law pretty well. I'm not an attorney, but I I've got the right to assemble and we are assembling. We have the right to redress the grievances. We have the right to have an opinion. Yes, we do. We have the right, no matter who you are, you have a right to have that opinion and have it be heard, no matter who you are. You have that right. And your opinion is probably very valid in some way or another. And I think that's an important part of the process is listening to people's opinions, whether we agree or disagree with them, and ponder it. and ponder it for a while and let it sink in and think about it for a little bit. I think that's a really good process to go through. Because like I said, again, the people we disagree with or the people that have a different opinion than ours is where we actually stretch our wings and learn a little bit. It's not the agreement club. It's the fact that we are listening to each other and we're giving people a chance to say what they what they feel, what they see, and their experience, and to just stop and pause and listen. It's kind of an art form. And I think that it's something that we have to remember, because I'm sure that when I said that last night to the attorneys, it was a mic drop moment. I mean, it was kind of like, they're looking at me like, are you kidding me? But they sat there, they listened to it at any rate, which I thought was pretty interesting. And so kind of an interesting time and an interesting process we're in right now. And it's a process of everyone's learning. But we elect our trustees. We elect our commissioners. They're controlled and directed by attorneys, which is a problem. And I agree with that. We've got to get the attorneys out of our trustees. And if I get a trustee that gets these three notices that Karen's produced, And that trustee, no matter who it is, no matter whether it's a sheriff, no matter whether it's a commissioner, no matter whether it's a county clerk, whatever they are, if they repent and say, oh my goodness, this is the law, and they acquiesce and they repent, they do escape punishment. We don't want to punish all of our trustees. Let's look at this a little further. A lot of our people in Congress and in office, holding office, are attorneys. That means they have a dual oath that they've sworn. So who do they serve? And that's a large problem. And my problem with keeping the structures intact that they've used to take us over is I don't have any belief that unless we tear these structures down that have been involved in criminality against the United States, they're like cockroaches. They're gonna come back. They're gonna reform. They're gonna start producing more of them. And so I think that, I think that to clean house and, and really, really, I mean, brutally clean house with what we have in our government, in the NGOs, in the five Oh one C threes, all of this has got to be brutally. And I mean, I mean decisively. torn, torn down. And then it's just like, it's just like, you know, fire, fire. I've said this to General Flynn. I'm like, we need to fire them all. He's like, well, you got to keep a few secretaries. Right. And and I think, though, that the structure for the for the American Bar and for the Bar Association and the fact that they're in our government, it's going to have to be they have to be not soft serve dealt with. And, you know, we, we've worked in the corporate world and we understand how this works, right? There's a point in time where, I mean, there's actually one company. I literally fired every single person in that company at one time. And I kept one person that led out the, and, and ratted out the rest of them on what they had done. And in one swift move, I fired everyone. And so, went to personally went to all of the all it would it took a little while i'm going to tell you what you know i grabbed a few people that i knew were honest and i went to every one of the said clients and said this is this is what happened and i want to let you know that i am going to be protecting you protecting what you have and i fired every single one of them that was involved in this And it was like, okay, this is what I got. Now it's time to start over. And it was a brutal come to Jesus moment for all of them. And it needed to happen. What she's trying to say here, folks, is that if you elect Donna Brandenburg, there's going to be a lot of firings happening in the corporate defense. There's going to be a lot of firings. And there's no quarter that can be given to people who have knowingly Now, not everybody knows, and there's a lot of people that have been blackmailed within the system. I acknowledge that, that that's a big problem. And if people come forward and tell exactly what happened and become whistleblowers, now we're playing ball, okay? Because that means that they were caught in a bad situation too. There's not one of us. that has escaped being involved on this in some level or another, including paying property taxes and paying income tax. We've enabled them to kill babies. We've enabled them to break the law and to weaponize this against us. It's time to stop. But when we go in there to clean it out, the cuts have to be absolutely brutal. And I'm pretty sure that all of the But surveillance that was meant to take us down is now being used against them, which is kind of a beautiful thing, really, because they set the precedent. And so let's just say and I'm not going to confirm or deny any of this. But everyone right now is under massive surveillance. And when President Trump stated it, we have it all, he meant we have it all. That means that when the cuts come, when the real cuts come, they're going to have everything we need to basically see exactly what's happened. And they've mapped it out. Can I ask you why President Trump signed the Genius Act then? Because the genius act, he said in that, that press conference that if you don't register under digital ID, you won't be able to live in society. President Trump is the bait for all things. And it's like, I think a lot of times he does think, he's like a dad. I mean, my dad would have done that, said, okay, let's see how stupid you are. Are you going to go along with this just because I said it? Or are you going to start thinking and even disagreeing with President Trump? And I think that's the exercise that's going on right now. But he's done a lot of things that that are really good and he's done things that I kind of disagree with. So the point being is that are we going to have him serve as a king or as a representative? And it doesn't matter who it is. If somebody gets off base, it's our responsibility to point it out, to say it. And then to start some sort of a notice going on that says, okay, first of all, you're out of line here, even if it's president Trump, because I think he's got a lot of people. And I've talked to, I've talked to plenty of people that have told me how the structure works of capturing these positions that are around president Trump. And so, and nothing is clean. We're in a war right now and everybody's going to come to terms with that. And so now the question is, are we going to be up to the task of, of questioning people instead of being part of a cult, worshiping a person instead of worshiping God alone, and being up to the task of questioning people, even those people that we love. And that would be, you know, if you love President Trump, if you said you were going to stand with him and you voted for him, it is your responsibility and mine. I voted for President Trump, and I was a very proud... Vote that I cast. I like President Trump. And so now it's our job. It's our duty to tell him, okay, this is unconstitutional. And whoever you're getting the advice from, this is really bad advice. And I'm going to put something up here. First of all, I want to share something because Sean Starry is out there. And he put this out in Grok and said, here are a bunch of resources that you can get curriculum to help. learn the Constitution at a very, you know, young age. And I thank you for sharing that. I think that that's really important. Everybody needs to have what they want to say out there. And we've got to be able to be thankful and also acknowledge and affirm the fact that what you have to say is important. And I'm glad you shared that. I'm very glad you shared that there. Let's see, what else was I going to pull up here? What was I talking about, Karen and Greg? Well, the one thing I want to mention on Trump to close that loop is that he continues to get lots of notices from our group because he has made a commitment to us when he at his inauguration that he was going to return the government to the people. I think he's doing it, but it's not a straight line. It's not a straight line. And literally, once we get these notices in place and we keep our focus on local so that we can manage it, the grant juries are absolutely going to be key. And I know he doesn't want to give them to us too far in advance, but Trump v. United States is very critical to understanding that these notices, everything that these trustees are doing, especially on the local level, is unconstitutional. There is no immunity for unconstitutional acts that they are committing. The minutes into a public-private partnership, The minute they do, which is literally what they're doing in water wars, every single one of them is committing treason. And they don't know it. They don't know it. Why? Because it's never been put in writing to them. Well, the other thing is, here's the test, Greg, is that they're worshiping the material world instead of serving God. It's a totally divergent way to think. And unless our minds... We have a sound mind in going forward with what we're doing, which the United States, the majority of the United States, doesn't have a sound mind. And the reason you can see it in the worship of the material world, wanting things and wanting recognition and wanting all these kudos and wanting to be out in front of everyone instead of saying, like a mom or a dad, I want to see you do better than me because I'm content where I am because I've got and that's all I need. And that's not being accomplished right now in any way, shape, or form. Think about laying the Bible out as the standard and looking at God's instruction manual and going back and saying, when God asks, how many righteous people will I find in this city? And he kept lowering the number until to destroy the city. He kept lowering the number and realized that there just aren't that many righteous people because our minds have been so corrupted. And the worship of the material world, rather than having that mindset of worshiping God alone and serving him alone. And if we don't have that, we got nothing. And we will not We will not be able, even the people that are doing the notices, I'm just going to put a challenge out there. I don't know everybody that's doing notices, and I wish to meet everyone. I hope that everyone out there has the motivation to do this as a service of God, not to be another group. that's a self-righteous self-serving group. And, and I believe that that's the case that you guys have right now, that it is a very service minded, not, you know, it's not a self-serving group, but it's a warning to all groups out there. When you see the competition start, you got a problem. When you see the, the, like the, the political parties, when you start seeing the competition to whose, whose idea or whose way is right, or this, that you've got a problem. And so, um, You know, this is the MO of the political parties right now. And it's something just to be aware of. And I think that that's not, I'm not saying as a beware for your group. I'm saying all of us, when you see that, it's got to be, take a time to take a pause. Because that's one of the first signs you'll see out there. Because people will be like, well, how do you know something is right or wrong? Well, are they worshiping God or are they worshiping the material world? It is written. It is, it is written. And it's like, you can, you can see, you can see right then and there that there's a problem. And so I think that, you know, people are afraid of that too, of misstepping. It's like, just be, you know, it's going to be okay. Ask God and he'll tell you what the right thing is. And he's going to show you every step of the way, what to do, how to do it. You don't have to be panicked. You don't have to be afraid. You know, and you can still be the calmest storm as we learn step by step and just keep moving forward. It doesn't have to be overwhelming. Just step by step. Make a commitment to serve God. There's your first step. And then then keep walking and don't stop, you know. And that's why the notices that our group does and we do them in the love of Jesus Christ. Every single one of them follows the law. And it's line by line, line by line, precept by precept, here a little, there a little. We follow that prescription because it's all written. And it's written and understood based upon the text history and tradition of when it was written, not the new definitions that they've created. through the Chevron doctrine of all these different codes and statutes and laws that they've created. We go back to the text, history, and tradition, God's law, the maxims of law, and that is what we use. We just need to educate our servants because we've lost it in the last hundred and fifty years. We stopped teaching it in eighteen sixty eight. They took the teaching of the state constitutions out of law school in eighteen sixty eight. How is that even possible? It blows your mind, doesn't it? I mean, it really blows your mind to see them. They don't teach law. All they teach is contract. That's all they teach. If you don't teach the state constitutions, my rights do not come from the federal government. Karen, what you got to say? Oh, I'm just listening along. And a while ago I said inconceivable because I was realizing that what Greg was saying sounded like the man in the Princess Bride movie. If we know this, therefore, it has to be this way. So it just kind of, you know, my mind drifts off like that. I just thought it was funny. Well, you know, we've been talking about these really, really serious subjects. And I know you guys and we probably have a bigger bandwidth just because we've been in this for a while than a lot of people who haven't been immersed in it. And it's important to take a pause here a little bit and go to something that's a little bit lighter and funnier. Hang on a minute. I'll put this up here. See if I can get it to go before. Why are you doing that? Are you sure nobody's following us? That would be inconceivable. doing that we can all relax it's almost over as i told you it would be absolutely totally and in all other ways inconceivable he's climbing the rope and he's getting on us inconceivable Okay, so that's like one of my favorite movies of all times. That's great. I was thinking of the later scene where he dies, but that's okay. We can go to that, too. That's pretty funny, actually. Let's see if I can pull it up here. See, if you're not laughing, this is the thing for me. Like I watch and I keep saying repeatedly on Telegram yesterday. I was like, this is a cloud show. This is a cloud show. And we have to learn the hard way because everything that's going on, like if you can't laugh at how ridiculous it looks right now. And how ridiculous it is. Then you're kind of missing out because people get so frustrated and angry and fearful. And here I am just sitting laughing because I'm like, this is so stupid. You're supposed to see it as stupid. If you're awake, you're supposed to be laughing at the stupid sombrero. And you're supposed to be laughing at how ridiculous it is that the White House is putting out party propaganda. I'm laughing over that. It's supposed to make you mad unless you know what a clown show it is. And then you go, oh, well, that, you know, if this was a real Congress and a real elect, you know, I want to say real presidency, but I don't know if it's a real presidency or not. But I know the Congress is fake. So I just laugh at it because I'm like, this is supposed to be waking up people who are not angry when they should be. Like, go ahead, guys. You get angry at that and I'll sit over here in my corner and laugh because... It takes more ridiculous It was like Biden How ridiculous did I call him faux Biden sometimes F-A-U-O Because the show that Our boy Blue Joe faux Biden Was putting on for us Was supposed to make people go What is going on here It's so fake Well yeah Why is it fake then How could that possibly be? You mean, oh, an auto pen is doing the job for him instead of an actual man that was actually inaugurated? No, if you go back and you look at the videos, he wasn't ever inaugurated. And it's not even him. So I'm just, you know, everything that he did, I'm just laughing at. Oh, he's tripping on the plane again. You know, and all the memes about how... he was so if he was an actor and I think he was, I think he was probably a series of actors. He got really good at falling and tripping and being, and speaking in a way that, I mean, it's hard to speak so poorly as he did. We do it every day here. I mean, it's not that hard to speak poorly, but we're not that bad. We're not that bad. We're supposed to be looking at this and going, you mean I had a man with full-blown dementia who can't walk, can't speak, can't sign things as our quote-unquote president? That's supposed to make people angry and make them angry. wake up to the point that they want to do something about it instead they're just sitting at home on their couches getting angry so at some point you have to like keep on poking them it's like the stick figure cartoon guy where he's poking somebody and saying i should make a i should make a meme for that Get off your butt and do something to disagree with the fake show. Because we're going to stay in it until enough people get off their butt and learn the standards. That's exactly right. It's like the white house website and all of it's not Democrats, the Democrats, the Democrats guys, this is like partisan politics for dummies and it should never be on the white house website website. And I speak out because it's like going, okay, I don't care what anybody's opinion is. This is just wrong at this point in time. This is my opinion and I'm going to say it. And it's like you shouldn't have something as partisan on the White House website. And it's wrong. And if everybody looks at that and gets a little, you know, go ahead and get a little mad about this. It's OK. And say, hold the phone a minute. Let's let's knock off this weaponized bunch of BS here. This is crap. And then call it out. You know, righteous anger isn't always wrong. You know, and it moves us to action. All right. I did this for you, Karen. I'm going to light things up here a little bit. Here we go. I'm going to have to stop this once in a while. Otherwise, I get hit by YouTube here. So we're just going to do this. All right. Where is the poison? The battle of wits has begun. It ends when you decide and we both drink and find out who is right and who is dead. But it's so simple. All I have to do is divine from what I know of you Are you the sort of man who would put the poison into his own goblet or his enemies? Now, a clever man would put the poison into his own goblet because he would know that only a great fool would reach for what he was given. I'm not a great fool, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of you. But you must have known I was not a great fool. You would have counted on it, so I can clearly... okay this is like watching alternative media and and fake media and trying to think we know what the heck's going on when the whole thing is is just just watch this okay this is this is our current situation of information you've made your decision then not remotely because iocane comes from australia as everyone knows And Australia is entirely people with criminals. And criminals are used to having people not trust them as you are not trusted by me, so I could clearly not choose the wine in front of you. Truly, you have a dizzying intellect. Wait till I get going! Where was I? Australia. Yes, Australia. And you must have suspected I would have known the powder's origin, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of me. You're just stalling now. You'd like to think that, wouldn't you? You've beaten my giant, which means you're exceptionally strong. So you could have put the poison in your own goblet, trusting on your strength to save me, so I could clearly not choose the wine in front of you. But you've also bested my spaniard, which means you must have studied. And in studying, you must have learned that man is mortal, so you would have put the poison as far from yourself as possible, so I could clearly not choose the wine in front of me. You're trying to trick me into giving away something. This is so funny. Does this remind you of the time we're living in? Yes, it does. We make my heart sing. That's why I was laughing so much. It has worked. You've given everything away. I know where the poison is. Then make your choice. I will, and I choose. What in the world can that be? What? I don't see anything. Oh, well, I saw something. No matter. Hmm. I'll tell you in a minute. There's your Republican-Democrat party and people trying to figure things out right there. You're not going to do it. They're just showing us what they want us to see. First, let's drink. Me from my glass and you from yours. Gastronome. You only think I guess wrong. That's not so funny. I sweat glasses when your back was turned. Ha-ha, you fool. You don't think you're one of the classic blunders. The most famous is not only in the land or in Asia, but only slightly less well-known is this. Never go in against the Sicilian. I love that. Isn't that funny? Okay, right now I'm pausing because I don't want to get dinged by YouTube, by SchmoozeTube. Here we go. There you go. That's great. And that is the people on Brandenburg News Network. We're not buying any of the crap from either side because it's all poison. That's why we question everything. What was that, Greg? It's all poison, and we know it. Yes. They just didn't think we'd ever figure it out. I would say to have the peace today, just kind of flush all this nonsense, bake a batch of cookies, go sit down with your neighbor, have some coffee, and then decide how you're going to study the Constitution and the founding documents. I mean, that would be a great place to start and end. And look at the things that are beautiful. I mean, the Bible talks about it. Look at those and focus on those things that edify you, that build you up, that are the good things. Because all of this nonsense, this tragedy and stuff, I don't believe one word out of this Charlie Kirk. situation not one i didn't from the beginning and i gotta tell you that was one of the hardest shows that i have ever done was when we did that night show and i know people needed to talk and i'm sitting there going wanting to say it's all fake it's all enough but also knowing people needed to talk i'm gonna tell you letting people work through their issues. It was a little difficult, but I endeavored to persevere, and I think I pulled it off without saying anything. I'm going to have to go back and watch it now. Yeah, it was like I'm sitting there going, this isn't making sense, none of it, guys, but we're all tied up in our little horse of terror situation running around the pastures and such. I'm sitting there going, And here I am. I'm not worried about Charlie Kirk. I was sad because other people were sad. Because that's what I picked up on. I'm sorry that you're sad. But it wasn't until probably, well, I think I quite probably like a lot of people wondered about it on the first day. By the second day, it's like what they're telling us goes, it's so narrative that it That triggers the red flags automatically. Like, oh, he was a tranny. Oh, well, of course he was a tranny because that totally explains everything. So then I don't have to look at anything else now because he was a lunatic out of his mind because he had a boyfriend or he had a girlfriend or I don't even know what to call them. But he had a roommate. Oh. That tells everything. Oh, he played online games. It must have been the online games that destroyed his mind. Oh, wait a minute. He had a gun down his pant leg? Oh, then they put out the videos. You know, they put out the videos of Charlie. Well, whose videos was that? The first videos that we saw. Who put those out there? I never saw credit where, you know, Jane Doe, casual witness, happened to be filming at the time on her cell phone. And she says, look, I'm a witness to this. And this is the recording. Nobody said that. Whose videos was that, people? All these people analyzing frame by frame. And they don't even know the source of the video to begin with. so then now now the narratives are so wild and out there somebody yesterday i was reading through some commentary because nobody's buying it on this thread and people said they thought he was um oh what was the word now i have to it'll come back to me anyway um people have so many different theories about what happened somebody was saying oh he was shot and killed but it was a drone that did it and it's like oh okay genius you figured it out how did you figure it out from the fake videos that they showed you from the unknown sources okay enjoy the eye cane powder you know it's like it's like great you know what it was They were saying that Charlie took the fall for some... Like he was a kamikaze. Like he had some kind of pressure on him so that he allowed it to happen to protect his family or something to that effect. And I guess I never even considered that theory. That whether he died or not, that he did it because... Whether he was playing a good guy role or a bad guy role, somebody said, you're going away. And you're going to do it this way. And he was like, okay. And then they put him into the witness protection program. That's what it was. Witness protection program to protect him from Israel. Lunatic trannies. They'd get mad because nobody... I don't know. I'm just going to go off in a really bad direction. It's crazy. This is insanity. And we think the left is insane. It's like... Please help me to understand why this is any less insane than what the other side is doing, if there is any other side, which I don't think there is any other side. Okay, this is nuts. So at any rate, I think we beat that dead horse to death here. Inconceivable. Inconceivable, that's right. Okay, we got to have another meme there, Karen. I'm going to have to rewrite the whole, I'm going to rewrite the whole scene at some point. That would be hilarious. All right, guys, let's go to prayers. And then I need to knock out for the day here because I got other things to do. So dear heavenly father, thank you so much for Greg and Karen and Bill and all the wonderful people that are out there that are always willing to give their time. and their experience. And we thank you so much for leading every single one of us as we go through our days to question everything. Thank you for General Flynn's post. He's just been amazing to stand in front of the threat that's in front of our country. And I ask your protection for General Flynn, Admiral Rogers and President Trump and all the good people that are behind whatever's going on here in the United States. is we see you leading us out of this captivity because ultimately we know you're leading us. And you're hopefully using those that are worthy. We know you are. That can do certain things. But the reality is, is that everything here is yours. It's your sandbox. We're just here to serve you in whatever way you ask. There's nothing we own. It's all yours. We can look around us and say, well, you have blessed us so much with so many wonderful people and things in our lives to live and enjoy the beautiful skies, our pets, the grass, the trees, the colors that are around us. And we are just supremely filled with gratitude. We're thankful that you've given us these lessons so that we can learn not to lean on our own understanding, but in all our ways, acknowledge you as you make our path straight. Thank you so much. We love you so much and want to go through this day acknowledging you, following you, and serving you in all of our actions, our words, our thoughts, and our deeds. And we just want to let you know we love you. In Jesus Christ's precious name we pray. Amen. Amen. Okay, so we're going to go real quick into last words, and then I'm locked and loaded here. Last words are real simple. Read those constitutions, take that challenge, and then we're going to do maxims. So we'll do constitutions and maxims. All yours, Karen. Where's the Bible in there, though? You got to start with the Bible, too. I assume that we all start with that. That's like taking a breath of air, right? I had to renew this book over here because I haven't gotten very far in it because I keep getting these other assignments that I have to do. Hey, but you like making memes. I mean, Karen and I are great friends. It's like Karen's great at this. So it's like, you know, it's got to add some levity to this very serious situation once in a while. So we need a meme, Karen. It takes you, what, like, ten seconds? You're so fast at it. No, because I got really, you know, basic tech to use, which is good because that's all I know how to use anyway. And so, you know, I can crop a Donna face and put it on a roller coaster and we're good to go. There you go. But I don't know. I think I'll do something with Princess Bride. But by the way, just because I know there's somebody at home going to be just brewing about this. So I did know that Badlands Media did a show, the story show, I forget what it's called, with Princess Bride. And they put politics in it. And they almost ruined the movie for me. Because it means so many other things that I never saw that it means. And it, oh, I got tricked, you know, into just being entertained by it. But I'm going to choose to just be entertained by the funny story and the funny lines anyway. Go out and smile, guys. OK, here's my twenty twenty two protesting. Go to Brenda for government.com because I'm the best non-conceiters ever. In the history of the United States of America, I'd like to have a discussion with the rightful president of the United States, President Donald J. Trump with cowboy boots. I wear better. We talk about this, that we fix everything. And thank you, President Trump, for everything you've done and all the good guys who are around you and the bad guys. Beware. We're coming. So at any rate, have a great day, guys. And, you know, go out there and smile and know that, you know what, this has been going on for forever. for centuries. The evil that we live with, this is nothing new. This is like getting diagnosed with cancer. The day you get diagnosed with cancer, which I had been in the past, and it's like the day you get diagnosed with cancer, it never changed it. You already had it the day before. So it's not like this great tragedy when it finally dawns on you or you find out. It's already there. The evil has been here for a very, very long time. We're just having to realize that, guess what? We're going to have to fight it and push back and learn to follow God and, you know, introspectively change our thought process. And that means worshiping God, not this world, not the systems, not our groups, not our groups we're in, anything like that. We worship God. We function within the world. But we are in the world, not of the world. And once we get that figured out, smooth sailing. So anyhow, God bless you all. God bless all those whom you love. And God bless America. Make it a great day. And go out smiling. Enjoy something. Do something you enjoy today. And whatever that may be. There could be a ton of things that you enjoy doing. But take a mental break here for a mental health break to do something fun. And we will see, I don't know if I'm going to be on tomorrow or not. I've liked having my Thursdays and Fridays off because it's a lot of work to get on. What's that? I don't allow it. Oh, you don't allow it. Okay. Might have to be on to show, to show a meme. If Karen makes a meme, guess what I'll be on tomorrow. I'm being voluntold by Karen. So anyhow, have a great day today. Have a good laugh and a smile.